Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: add msm8974 bindings

[Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>]

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:01:03PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 02 Sep 14:19 PDT 2019, Brian Masney wrote:
> > +      mmssnoc: interconnect@fc478000 {
> > +              reg = <0xfc478000 0x4000>;
> > +              compatible = "qcom,msm8974-mmssnoc";
> > +              #interconnect-cells = <1>;
> > +              clock-names = "bus", "bus_a";
> > +              clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_MMSSNOC_AHB_CLK>,
> > +                       <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_MMSSNOC_AHB_A_CLK>;
> 
> Isn't MMSS_S0_AXI_CLK the bus clock of the mmssnoc (which somehow seems
> to depend on mmssnoc_ahb_clk)?

I'll give that a try. Do you know which clock I should use for bus_a
here? On the mmcc, I see the following mmss clocks available:

MMSS_AHB_CLK_SRC
MMSS_AXI_CLK_SRC
MMSS_RBCPR_CLK_SRC
MMSS_MISC_AHB_CLK
MMSS_MMSSNOC_AHB_CLK
MMSS_MMSSNOC_BTO_AHB_CLK
MMSS_MMSSNOC_AXI_CLK
MMSS_S0_AXI_CLK

I'm also unsure of what's going on at the hardware level that the second
clock (bus_a) is needed.

> > +      mdss: mdss@fd900000 {
> 
> I think you can omit the client, as this adheres to the standard binding
> for interconnect clients. And you don't need to have an example that
> covers all compatibles either...

OK, I'll drop some of these.

> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8974.h b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8974.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..58acf7196410
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8974.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> 
> Would you mind dual licensing this part as well?

Sure, that was an oversight on my part.

> Apart from that, I think this binding looks good.

Thanks,

Brian