From: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
To: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@codeaurora.org>,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: set ubwc config for A640 and A650
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:40:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526164057.GC20960@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526032514.22198-1-jonathan@marek.ca>
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:25:13PM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> This is required for A640 and A650 to be able to share UBWC-compressed
> images with other HW such as display, which expect this configuration.
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 6f335ae179c8..aa004a261277 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -289,6 +289,37 @@ static void a6xx_set_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool state)
> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL, state ? 0x8aa8aa02 : 0);
> }
>
> +static void a6xx_set_ubwc_config(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> +{
> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> + u32 lower_bit = 2;
> + u32 amsbc = 0;
> + u32 rgb565_predicator = 0;
> + u32 uavflagprd_inv = 0;
> +
This hardware design has the amazing ability to make me sad every time I see it.
> + /* a618 is using the hw default values */
> + if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu))
> + return;
> +
I've been a recent convert to the cult of <linux/bitfields.h> and FIELD_PREP()
could help, maybe?
if (adreno_is_a640(adreno_gpu)) {
rb_ncmode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_RB_NC_MODE_CNTL_AMSBC, 1);
rb_ncmode |= FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_RB_NC_MODE_CNTL_HBB, 2);
tpl1_ncmode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_TPL1_NC_MODE_HBB, 2);
sp_ncmode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_TPL1_NC_MODE_HBB, 2);
uchemode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_UCHE_MODE_CNTL_HBB, 2);
} else if adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) {
rb_ncmode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_RB_NC_MODE_CNTL_AMSBC, 1);
rb_ncmode |= FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_RB_NC_MODE_CNTL_HBB, 3);
rb_ncmode |= FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_RB_NC_MODE_CNTL_RGB565, 1);
tpl1_ncmode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_TPL1_NC_MODE_HBB, 3);
sp_ncmode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_TPL1_NC_MODE_HBB, 3);
sp_ncmode |= FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_TPL1_NC_MODE_UAVFLAGPRD_INV, 2);
uchemode = FIELD_PREP(REG_A6XX_UCHE_MODE_CNTL_HBB, 2);
}
I'm not sure if that is any clearer or not. Perhaps this is a problem for the
next person to add a new target. Regardless the code is programming the
hardware correctly so...
Reviewed-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> + if (adreno_is_a640(adreno_gpu))
> + amsbc = 1;
> +
> + if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) {
> + /* TODO: get ddr type from bootloader and use 2 for LPDDR4 */
> + lower_bit = 3;
> + amsbc = 1;
> + rgb565_predicator = 1;
> + uavflagprd_inv = 2;
> + }
> +
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RB_NC_MODE_CNTL,
> + rgb565_predicator << 11 | amsbc << 4 | lower_bit << 1);
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_NC_MODE_CNTL, lower_bit << 1);
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_SP_NC_MODE_CNTL,
> + uavflagprd_inv >> 4 | lower_bit << 1);
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_UCHE_MODE_CNTL, lower_bit << 21);
> +}
> +
> static int a6xx_cp_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> {
> struct msm_ringbuffer *ring = gpu->rb[0];
> @@ -478,12 +509,7 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> /* Select CP0 to always count cycles */
> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_PERFCTR_CP_SEL_0, PERF_CP_ALWAYS_COUNT);
>
> - if (adreno_is_a630(adreno_gpu)) {
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RB_NC_MODE_CNTL, 2 << 1);
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_NC_MODE_CNTL, 2 << 1);
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_SP_NC_MODE_CNTL, 2 << 1);
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_UCHE_MODE_CNTL, 2 << 21);
> - }
> + a6xx_set_ubwc_config(gpu);
>
> /* Enable fault detection */
> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_INTERFACE_HANG_INT_CNTL,
> --
> 2.26.1
>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 3:25 [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: set ubwc config for A640 and A650 Jonathan Marek
2020-05-26 16:40 ` Jordan Crouse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200526164057.GC20960@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com \
--to=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=smasetty@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox