From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
Cc: shawn.guo@linaro.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org, robh@kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
agross@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add MSM8939 power-domains
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:15:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916110412.GA25472@gerhold.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916074924.20637-1-jun.nie@linaro.org>
Hi,
Thanks for sending a v2!
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:49:24PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Add the shared modemcx/cx/mx power-domains found on MSM8939.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 10 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> index 8058955fb3b9..ce9b556ac155 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ description:
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> + - qcom,msm8939-rpmpd
> - qcom,msm8976-rpmpd
> - qcom,msm8996-rpmpd
> - qcom,msm8998-rpmpd
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> index f2168e4259b2..829f51881e41 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,34 @@ static const struct rpmpd_desc qcs404_desc = {
> .max_state = RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING,
> };
>
> +/* msm8939 RPM Power Domains */
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8939, vddmd, vddmd_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 1);
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8939, vddmd_vfc, SMPA, 1);
> +
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8939, vddcx, vddcx_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 2);
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8939, vddcx_vfc, SMPA, 2);
> +
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8939, vddmx, vddmx_ao, LDOA, CORNER, 3);
> +
> +static struct rpmpd *msm8939_rpmpds[] = {
> + [MSM8939_VDDMDCX] = &msm8939_vddmd,
> + [MSM8939_VDDMDCX_AO] = &msm8939_vddmd_ao,
> + [MSM8939_VDDMDCX_VFC] = &msm8939_vddmd_vfc,
> + [MSM8939_VDDCX] = &msm8939_vddcx,
> + [MSM8939_VDDCX_AO] = &msm8939_vddcx_ao,
> + [MSM8939_VDDCX_VFC] = &msm8939_vddcx_vfc,
> + [MSM8939_VDDMX] = &msm8939_vddmx,
> + [MSM8939_VDDMX_AO] = &msm8939_vddmx_ao,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmpd_desc msm8939_desc = {
> + .rpmpds = msm8939_rpmpds,
> + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8939_rpmpds),
> + .max_state = MSM8939_VDDMX_AO,
> +};
For consistent ordering this block should be also above
/* msm8976 RPM Power Domains */
Also: .max_state still looks wrong to me. It has nothing to do with the
number of power domains (MSM8939_VDDMX_AO). Instead, it is supposed to
be the maximum possible peformance state (in your case: voltage corner).
As far as I know, all SoCs using voltage corners use the same set of
corners, a value from 0-6 for the following corners [1]:
0. None
1. Retention
2. SVS Krait
3. SVS SoC
4. Normal/Nominal
5. Turbo
6. Super Turbo
(The corners are shifted by one in the msm-3.10 driver...)
Super Turbo (= 6) is the .max_state you want to set here.
That's why I suggested setting .max_state to MAX_8996_RPMPD_STATE (= 6).
In my patch series for MSM8916, I renamed MAX_8996_RPMPD_STATE to
MAX_CORNER_RPMPD_STATE [2]. Maybe that makes it a bit more clear.
Thanks!
Stephan
[1]: https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/include/linux/regulator/rpm-smd-regulator.h?h=LA.BR.1.2.9.1-02310-8x16.0#n31
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200916104135.25085-2-stephan@gerhold.net/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 7:49 [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add MSM8939 power-domains Jun Nie
2020-09-16 7:52 ` Jun Nie
2020-09-16 21:15 ` Stephan Gerhold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916110412.GA25472@gerhold.net \
--to=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=jun.nie@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox