From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: hemantk@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mhi: add MHI_STATE_M2 to resume success criteria
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 18:15:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521124530.GF70095@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420035339.282963-1-bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Hi,
The patch subject should be,
"bus: mhi: Wait for M2 state during system resume"
We follow "bus: mhi:" prefix for all MHI patches. Also, the subject should
clearly portray what the patch is intend to do.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:53:39AM +0800, Baochen Qiang wrote:
> During system resume, mhi driver triggers M3->M0 transition and then waits
s/mhi driver/MHI host
> for target device to enter M0 state. Once done, the device queues a state
> change event into ctrl event ring and notify mhi dirver by raising an
s/notify/notifies and s/mhi dirver/MHI host. MHI driver is somewhat confusing
since we have the MHI device driver (QRTR etc...) as well. So just use MHI host
everywhere.
> interrupt, where a tasklet is scheduled to process this event. In most cases,
> the taklet is served timely and wait operation succeeds.
>
s/taklet/tasklet
> However, there are cases where CPU is busy and can not serve this tasklet
a/can not/cannot
> for some time. Once delay goes long enough, the device moves itself to M1
> state and also interrupts mhi driver after inserting a new state change
> event to ctrl ring. Later CPU finally has time to process the ring, however
> there are two events in it now:
> 1. for M3->M0 event, which is processed first as queued first,
> tasklet handler updates device state to M0 and wakes up the task,
> i.e., the mhi driver.
> 2. for M0->M1 event, which is processed later, tasklet handler
> triggers M1->M2 transition and updates device state to M2 directly,
> then wakes up the mhi driver(if still sleeping on this wait queue).
> Note that although mhi driver has been woken up while processing the first
> event, it may still has no chance to run before the second event is processed.
> In other words, mhi driver has to keep waiting till timeout cause the M0 state
> has been missed.
>
> kernel log here:
> ...
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.911251] mhi 0000:06:00.0: Entered with PM state: M3, MHI state: M3
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.917762] mhi 0000:06:00.0: State change event to state: M0
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.917767] mhi 0000:06:00.0: State change event to state: M1
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4338.788231] mhi 0000:06:00.0: Did not enter M0 state, MHI state: M2, PM state: M2
> ...
>
> Fix this issue by simply adding M2 as a valid state for resume.
>
> Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-01720.1-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-1
>
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Could you please add a fixes tag as well? And this patch should be backported to
stable kernels also, so please CC stable@vger.kernel.org.
Thanks,
Mani
> ---
> drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> index ce73cfa63cb3..ca5f2feed9d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> @@ -900,6 +900,7 @@ int mhi_pm_resume(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
>
> ret = wait_event_timeout(mhi_cntrl->state_event,
> mhi_cntrl->dev_state == MHI_STATE_M0 ||
> + mhi_cntrl->dev_state == MHI_STATE_M2 ||
> MHI_PM_IN_ERROR_STATE(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
> msecs_to_jiffies(mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms));
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 3:53 [PATCH] mhi: add MHI_STATE_M2 to resume success criteria Baochen Qiang
2021-05-03 23:55 ` Hemant Kumar
2021-05-21 12:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-05-24 3:14 ` bqiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210521124530.GF70095@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bqiang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).