Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Kiran Gunda <quic_kgunda@quicinc.com>,
	Anirudh Ghayal <quic_aghayal@quicinc.com>,
	Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: fix irq_set_type race condition
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:14:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211216071403.BE178C36AE2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211118034719.28971-1-quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>

Quoting David Collins (2021-11-17 19:47:19)
> The qpnpint_irq_set_type() callback function configures the type
> (edge vs level) and polarity (high, low, or both) of a particular
> PMIC interrupt within a given peripheral.  To do this, it reads
> the three consecutive IRQ configuration registers, modifies the
> specified IRQ bit within the register values, and finally writes
> the three modified register values back to the PMIC.  While a
> spinlock is used to provide mutual exclusion on the SPMI bus
> during the register read and write calls, there is no locking
> around the overall read, modify, write sequence.  This opens up
> the possibility of a race condition if two tasks set the type of
> a PMIC IRQ within the same peripheral simultaneously.
> 
> When the race condition is encountered, both tasks will read the
> old value of the registers and IRQ bits set by one of the tasks
> will be dropped upon the register write of the other task.  This
> then leads to PMIC IRQs being enabled with an incorrect type and
> polarity configured.  Such misconfiguration can lead to an IRQ
> storm that overwhelms the system and causes it to crash.
> 
> This race condition and IRQ storm have been observed when using
> a pair of pm8941-pwrkey devices to handle PMK8350 pwrkey and
> resin interrupts.  The independent devices probe asynchronously
> in parallel and can simultaneously request and configure PMIC
> IRQs in the same PMIC peripheral.
> 
> For a good case, the IRQ configuration calls end up serialized
> due to timing deltas and the register read/write sequence looks
> like this:
> 
> 1. pwrkey probe: SPMI  read(0x1311): 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> 2. pwrkey probe: SPMI write(0x1311): 0x80, 0x80, 0x80
> 3. resin probe:  SPMI  read(0x1311): 0x80, 0x80, 0x80
> 4. resin probe:  SPMI write(0x1311): 0xC0, 0xC0, 0xC0
> 
> The final register states after both devices have requested and
> enabled their respective IRQs is thus:
> 
> 0x1311: 0xC0
> 0x1312: 0xC0
> 0x1313: 0xC0
> 0x1314: 0x00
> 0x1315: 0xC0
> 
> For a bad case, the IRQ configuration calls end up occurring
> simultaneously and the race condition is encountered.  The
> register read/write sequence then looks like this:
> 
> 1. pwrkey probe: SPMI  read(0x1311): 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> 2. resin probe:  SPMI  read(0x1311): 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> 3. pwrkey probe: SPMI write(0x1311): 0x80, 0x80, 0x80
> 4. resin probe:  SPMI write(0x1311): 0x40, 0x40, 0x40
> 
> In this case, the final register states after both devices have
> requested and enabled their respective IRQs is thus:
> 
> 0x1311: 0x40
> 0x1312: 0x40
> 0x1313: 0x40
> 0x1314: 0x00
> 0x1315: 0xC0
> 
> This corresponds to the resin IRQ being configured for both
> rising and falling edges, as expected.  However, the pwrkey IRQ
> is misconfigured as level type with both polarity high and low
> set to disabled.  The PMIC IRQ triggering hardware treats this
> particular register configuration as if level low triggering is
> enabled.
> 
> The raw pwrkey IRQ signal is low when the power key is not being
> pressed.  Thus, the pwrkey IRQ begins firing continuously in an
> IRQ storm.
> 
> Fix the race condition by holding the spmi-pmic-arb spinlock for
> the duration of the read, modify, write sequence performed in the
> qpnpint_irq_set_type() function.  Split the pmic_arb_read_cmd()
> and pmic_arb_write_cmd() functions each into three parts so that
> hardware register IO is decoupled from spinlock locking.  This
> allows a new function pmic_arb_masked_write() to be added which
> locks the spinlock and then calls register IO functions to
> perform SPMI read and write commands in a single atomic
> operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
> ---

Applied to spmi-next

      reply	other threads:[~2021-12-16  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-18  3:47 [PATCH v2] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: fix irq_set_type race condition David Collins
2021-12-16  7:14 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211216071403.BE178C36AE2@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_aghayal@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_kgunda@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox