From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Kiran Gunda <quic_kgunda@quicinc.com>,
Anirudh Ghayal <quic_aghayal@quicinc.com>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: fix irq_set_type race condition
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:14:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211216071403.BE178C36AE2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211118034719.28971-1-quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Quoting David Collins (2021-11-17 19:47:19)
> The qpnpint_irq_set_type() callback function configures the type
> (edge vs level) and polarity (high, low, or both) of a particular
> PMIC interrupt within a given peripheral. To do this, it reads
> the three consecutive IRQ configuration registers, modifies the
> specified IRQ bit within the register values, and finally writes
> the three modified register values back to the PMIC. While a
> spinlock is used to provide mutual exclusion on the SPMI bus
> during the register read and write calls, there is no locking
> around the overall read, modify, write sequence. This opens up
> the possibility of a race condition if two tasks set the type of
> a PMIC IRQ within the same peripheral simultaneously.
>
> When the race condition is encountered, both tasks will read the
> old value of the registers and IRQ bits set by one of the tasks
> will be dropped upon the register write of the other task. This
> then leads to PMIC IRQs being enabled with an incorrect type and
> polarity configured. Such misconfiguration can lead to an IRQ
> storm that overwhelms the system and causes it to crash.
>
> This race condition and IRQ storm have been observed when using
> a pair of pm8941-pwrkey devices to handle PMK8350 pwrkey and
> resin interrupts. The independent devices probe asynchronously
> in parallel and can simultaneously request and configure PMIC
> IRQs in the same PMIC peripheral.
>
> For a good case, the IRQ configuration calls end up serialized
> due to timing deltas and the register read/write sequence looks
> like this:
>
> 1. pwrkey probe: SPMI read(0x1311): 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> 2. pwrkey probe: SPMI write(0x1311): 0x80, 0x80, 0x80
> 3. resin probe: SPMI read(0x1311): 0x80, 0x80, 0x80
> 4. resin probe: SPMI write(0x1311): 0xC0, 0xC0, 0xC0
>
> The final register states after both devices have requested and
> enabled their respective IRQs is thus:
>
> 0x1311: 0xC0
> 0x1312: 0xC0
> 0x1313: 0xC0
> 0x1314: 0x00
> 0x1315: 0xC0
>
> For a bad case, the IRQ configuration calls end up occurring
> simultaneously and the race condition is encountered. The
> register read/write sequence then looks like this:
>
> 1. pwrkey probe: SPMI read(0x1311): 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> 2. resin probe: SPMI read(0x1311): 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> 3. pwrkey probe: SPMI write(0x1311): 0x80, 0x80, 0x80
> 4. resin probe: SPMI write(0x1311): 0x40, 0x40, 0x40
>
> In this case, the final register states after both devices have
> requested and enabled their respective IRQs is thus:
>
> 0x1311: 0x40
> 0x1312: 0x40
> 0x1313: 0x40
> 0x1314: 0x00
> 0x1315: 0xC0
>
> This corresponds to the resin IRQ being configured for both
> rising and falling edges, as expected. However, the pwrkey IRQ
> is misconfigured as level type with both polarity high and low
> set to disabled. The PMIC IRQ triggering hardware treats this
> particular register configuration as if level low triggering is
> enabled.
>
> The raw pwrkey IRQ signal is low when the power key is not being
> pressed. Thus, the pwrkey IRQ begins firing continuously in an
> IRQ storm.
>
> Fix the race condition by holding the spmi-pmic-arb spinlock for
> the duration of the read, modify, write sequence performed in the
> qpnpint_irq_set_type() function. Split the pmic_arb_read_cmd()
> and pmic_arb_write_cmd() functions each into three parts so that
> hardware register IO is decoupled from spinlock locking. This
> allows a new function pmic_arb_masked_write() to be added which
> locks the spinlock and then calls register IO functions to
> perform SPMI read and write commands in a single atomic
> operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
> ---
Applied to spmi-next
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-16 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 3:47 [PATCH v2] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: fix irq_set_type race condition David Collins
2021-12-16 7:14 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211216071403.BE178C36AE2@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_aghayal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_kgunda@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox