From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move implementation data into match data
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 21:44:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102184420.534094-7-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102184420.534094-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
In preparation to rework of the implementation and configuration
details, make qcom_smmu_create() accept new qcom_smmu_match_data
structure pointer. Make implementation a field in this struct.
Reviewed-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 58 ++++++++++++++--------
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 4 ++
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index b2708de25ea3..bd228b7d6817 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -405,10 +405,18 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_impl = {
};
static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
- const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl)
+ const struct qcom_smmu_match_data *data)
{
+ const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu;
+ if (!data)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ impl = data->impl;
+ if (!impl)
+ return smmu;
+
/* Check to make sure qcom_scm has finished probing */
if (!qcom_scm_is_available())
return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
@@ -423,22 +431,30 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return &qsmmu->smmu;
}
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_data = {
+ .impl = &qcom_smmu_impl,
+};
+
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_adreno_smmu_data = {
+ .impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500" },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ }
};
@@ -453,12 +469,13 @@ static struct acpi_platform_list qcom_acpi_platlist[] = {
struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
+ const struct of_device_id *match;
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
if (np == NULL) {
/* Match platform for ACPI boot */
if (acpi_match_platform_list(qcom_acpi_platlist) >= 0)
- return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
+ return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_data);
}
#endif
@@ -469,10 +486,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
* features if the order is changed.
*/
if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
- return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl);
+ return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_data);
- if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
- return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
+ match = of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np);
+ if (match)
+ return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, match->data);
return smmu;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index 99ec8f8629a0..2424f10b7110 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ struct qcom_smmu {
u32 stall_enabled;
};
+struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
+ const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_QCOM_DEBUG
void qcom_smmu_tlb_sync_debug(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
const void *qcom_smmu_impl_data(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 18:44 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Rework Qualcomm SMMU bindings and implementation Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: change order of SMMU clocks on this platform Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 20:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-08 4:36 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add missing Qualcomm SMMU compatibles Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: fix clocks/clock-names schema Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 20:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-02 20:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: add special case for Google Cheza platform Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 20:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 bindings Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 18:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: provide separate implementation for SDM845-smmu-500 Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-04 22:16 ` Richard Acayan
2022-11-05 0:02 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-05 1:42 ` Richard Acayan
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Merge table from arm-smmu-qcom-debug into match data Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Stop using mmu500 reset for v2 MMUs Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-02 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 match entry Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-14 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Rework Qualcomm SMMU bindings and implementation Will Deacon
2022-11-14 17:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221102184420.534094-7-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_saipraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).