Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, loic.poulain@linaro.org, mhi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	quic_cang@quicinc.com, mrana@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bus: mhi: host: Disable preemption while processing data events
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:13:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221117114336.GC93179@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1668479031-12853-1-git-send-email-quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:23:51AM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> If data processing of an event is scheduled out because core
> is busy handling multiple irqs, this can starve the processing
> of MHI M0 state change event on another core. Fix this issue by
> disabling irq on the core processing data events.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>

I'm counting on Jeff's review for this patch.

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
> v2->v3: modify the comment
> v1->v2: add comments about why we disable local irq
> 
>  drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> index f3aef77a..5dca0a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> @@ -1027,13 +1027,20 @@ int mhi_process_data_event_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  
>  void mhi_ev_task(unsigned long data)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct mhi_event *mhi_event = (struct mhi_event *)data;
>  	struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = mhi_event->mhi_cntrl;
>  
>  	/* process all pending events */
> -	spin_lock_bh(&mhi_event->lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mhi_event->lock, flags);
> +	/*
> +	 * When multiple IRQs come, the tasklet will be scheduled out with event ring lock
> +	 * remaining acquired, causing M0 event process on another core gets stuck when it
> +	 * tries to acquire the same event ring lock. Thus, let's disable local IRQs here.
> +	 */
> +
>  	mhi_event->process_event(mhi_cntrl, mhi_event, U32_MAX);
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&mhi_event->lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mhi_event->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  void mhi_ctrl_ev_task(unsigned long data)
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-17 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15  2:23 [PATCH v3] bus: mhi: host: Disable preemption while processing data events Qiang Yu
2022-11-17 11:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2022-11-17 11:49 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221117114336.GC93179@thinkpad \
    --to=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mrana@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_qianyu@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox