Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@quicinc.com>
Cc: arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, quic_clew@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] remoteproc: core: change to ordered workqueue for crash handler
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:34:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221202173403.GD165812@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221202094532.2925-3-quic_aiquny@quicinc.com>

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Maria Yu wrote:
> Only the first detected crash needed to be handled, so change
> to ordered workqueue to avoid unnecessary multi active work at
> the same time. This will reduce the pm_relax unnecessary concurrency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index c2d0af048c69..4b973eea10bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -2728,8 +2728,8 @@ static void __exit rproc_exit_panic(void)
>  
>  static int __init remoteproc_init(void)
>  {
> -	rproc_recovery_wq = alloc_workqueue("rproc_recovery_wq",
> -						WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);
> +	rproc_recovery_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("rproc_recovery_wq",
> +						WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);

There is an indentation issue with the second line and this patch doesn't
compile:

  CC      drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.o
  AR      drivers/hwspinlock/built-in.a
In file included from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/rhashtable-types.h:15,
                 from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/ipc.h:7,
                 from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5,
                 from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/sem.h:5,
                 from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/sched.h:15,
                 from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/delay.h:23,
                 from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:19:
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c: In function ‘remoteproc_init’:
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2738:46: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
 2738 |  rproc_recovery_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("rproc_recovery_wq",
      |                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/workqueue.h:419:18: note: in definition of macro ‘alloc_ordered_workqueue’
  419 |  alloc_workqueue(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED |  \
      |                  ^~~

Last but not least, please use the get_maintainer.pl script to make sure the
right people are CC'ed on your patchsets.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  	if (!rproc_recovery_wq) {
>  		pr_err("remoteproc: creation of rproc_recovery_wq failed\n");
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-02 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-02  9:45 [PATCH v5 0/2] remoteproc: core: do pm relax when in Maria Yu
2022-12-02  9:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] remoteproc: core: do pm relax when in RPROC_OFFLINE Maria Yu
2022-12-02 17:30   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-12-06  0:58     ` Aiqun(Maria) Yu
2022-12-02 18:09   ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-12-06  1:05     ` Aiqun(Maria) Yu
2022-12-02  9:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] remoteproc: core: change to ordered workqueue for crash handler Maria Yu
2022-12-02 17:34   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-12-06  1:28     ` Aiqun(Maria) Yu
2022-12-07 18:16       ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-12-02 18:16   ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-12-06  1:42     ` Aiqun(Maria) Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221202173403.GD165812@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_aiquny@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_clew@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox