From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/11] drm/msm: Enable fence signalling annotations
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:01:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822180208.95556-12-robdclark@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822180208.95556-1-robdclark@gmail.com>
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Now that the runpm/qos/interconnect lockdep vs reclaim issues are
solved, we can enable the fence signalling annotations without lockdep
making it's immediate displeasure known.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
index 7f5e0a961bba..cb9cf41bcb9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct msm_ringbuffer *msm_ringbuffer_new(struct msm_gpu *gpu, int id,
/* currently managing hangcheck ourselves: */
sched_timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+ ring->sched.fence_signalling = true;
ret = drm_sched_init(&ring->sched, &msm_sched_ops,
num_hw_submissions, 0, sched_timeout,
NULL, NULL, to_msm_bo(ring->bo)->name, gpu->dev->dev);
--
2.41.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 18:01 [PATCH v5 00/11] drm/msm+PM+icc: Make job_run() reclaim-safe Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] PM / devfreq: Drop unneed locking to appease lockdep Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] PM / devfreq: Teach lockdep about locking order Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] PM / QoS: Fix constraints alloc vs reclaim locking Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-22 19:41 ` Rob Clark
2023-08-23 21:01 ` Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos_mtx Rob Clark
2023-09-22 7:14 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] PM / QoS: Teach lockdep about dev_pm_qos_mtx locking order Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] interconnect: Teach lockdep about icc_bw_lock order Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] drm/msm/a6xx: Remove GMU lock from runpm paths Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] drm/msm: Move runpm enable in submit path Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] drm/sched: Add (optional) fence signaling annotation Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` Rob Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230822180208.95556-12-robdclark@gmail.com \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).