From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, rui.zhang@intel.com,
mhiramat@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
amit.kachhap@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Take cpufreq feedback into account
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:27:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231212142730.998913-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212142730.998913-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Aggregate the different pressures applied on the capacity of CPUs and
create a new function that returns the actual capacity of the CPU:
get_actual_cpu_capacity()
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index bcea3d55d95d..11d3be829302 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4932,12 +4932,20 @@ static inline void util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
trace_sched_util_est_se_tp(&p->se);
}
+static inline unsigned long get_actual_cpu_capacity(int cpu)
+{
+ unsigned long capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+
+ capacity -= max(thermal_load_avg(cpu_rq(cpu)), cpufreq_get_pressure(cpu));
+
+ return capacity;
+}
static inline int util_fits_cpu(unsigned long util,
unsigned long uclamp_min,
unsigned long uclamp_max,
int cpu)
{
- unsigned long capacity_orig, capacity_orig_thermal;
+ unsigned long capacity_orig;
unsigned long capacity = capacity_of(cpu);
bool fits, uclamp_max_fits;
@@ -4970,7 +4978,6 @@ static inline int util_fits_cpu(unsigned long util,
* goal is to cap the task. So it's okay if it's getting less.
*/
capacity_orig = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
- capacity_orig_thermal = capacity_orig - arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpu);
/*
* We want to force a task to fit a cpu as implied by uclamp_max.
@@ -5045,7 +5052,7 @@ static inline int util_fits_cpu(unsigned long util,
* handle the case uclamp_min > uclamp_max.
*/
uclamp_min = min(uclamp_min, uclamp_max);
- if (fits && (util < uclamp_min) && (uclamp_min > capacity_orig_thermal))
+ if (fits && (util < uclamp_min) && (uclamp_min > get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu)))
return -1;
return fits;
@@ -7426,7 +7433,7 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
* Look for the CPU with best capacity.
*/
else if (fits < 0)
- cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu) - thermal_load_avg(cpu_rq(cpu));
+ cpu_cap = get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu);
/*
* First, select CPU which fits better (-1 being better than 0).
@@ -7919,8 +7926,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
struct root_domain *rd = this_rq()->rd;
int cpu, best_energy_cpu, target = -1;
int prev_fits = -1, best_fits = -1;
- unsigned long best_thermal_cap = 0;
- unsigned long prev_thermal_cap = 0;
+ unsigned long best_actual_cap = 0;
+ unsigned long prev_actual_cap = 0;
struct sched_domain *sd;
struct perf_domain *pd;
struct energy_env eenv;
@@ -7950,7 +7957,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
unsigned long util_min = p_util_min, util_max = p_util_max;
- unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_thermal_cap, util;
+ unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_actual_cap, util;
long prev_spare_cap = -1, max_spare_cap = -1;
unsigned long rq_util_min, rq_util_max;
unsigned long cur_delta, base_energy;
@@ -7962,18 +7969,17 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
if (cpumask_empty(cpus))
continue;
- /* Account thermal pressure for the energy estimation */
+ /* Account external pressure for the energy estimation */
cpu = cpumask_first(cpus);
- cpu_thermal_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
- cpu_thermal_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpu);
+ cpu_actual_cap = get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu);
- eenv.cpu_cap = cpu_thermal_cap;
+ eenv.cpu_cap = cpu_actual_cap;
eenv.pd_cap = 0;
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- eenv.pd_cap += cpu_thermal_cap;
+ eenv.pd_cap += cpu_actual_cap;
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
continue;
@@ -8044,7 +8050,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
if (prev_delta < base_energy)
goto unlock;
prev_delta -= base_energy;
- prev_thermal_cap = cpu_thermal_cap;
+ prev_actual_cap = cpu_actual_cap;
best_delta = min(best_delta, prev_delta);
}
@@ -8059,7 +8065,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
* but best energy cpu has better capacity.
*/
if ((max_fits < 0) &&
- (cpu_thermal_cap <= best_thermal_cap))
+ (cpu_actual_cap <= best_actual_cap))
continue;
cur_delta = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p,
@@ -8080,14 +8086,14 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
best_delta = cur_delta;
best_energy_cpu = max_spare_cap_cpu;
best_fits = max_fits;
- best_thermal_cap = cpu_thermal_cap;
+ best_actual_cap = cpu_actual_cap;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
if ((best_fits > prev_fits) ||
((best_fits > 0) && (best_delta < prev_delta)) ||
- ((best_fits < 0) && (best_thermal_cap > prev_thermal_cap)))
+ ((best_fits < 0) && (best_actual_cap > prev_actual_cap)))
target = best_energy_cpu;
return target;
@@ -9466,7 +9472,7 @@ static inline void init_sd_lb_stats(struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- unsigned long max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+ unsigned long max = get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu);
unsigned long used, free;
unsigned long irq;
@@ -9478,12 +9484,9 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
/*
* avg_rt.util_avg and avg_dl.util_avg track binary signals
* (running and not running) with weights 0 and 1024 respectively.
- * avg_thermal.load_avg tracks thermal pressure and the weighted
- * average uses the actual delta max capacity(load).
*/
used = READ_ONCE(rq->avg_rt.util_avg);
used += READ_ONCE(rq->avg_dl.util_avg);
- used += thermal_load_avg(rq);
if (unlikely(used >= max))
return 1;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-12 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 14:27 [PATCH 0/5] Rework system pressure interface to the scheduler Vincent Guittot
2023-12-12 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for " Vincent Guittot
2023-12-13 7:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-12-13 8:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-12-14 0:41 ` Tim Chen
2023-12-14 5:36 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-12-14 5:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-12-14 7:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-12-14 9:08 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-12-14 9:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-12-14 10:41 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-12-14 9:21 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-12-14 11:06 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-12-12 14:27 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2023-12-15 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Take cpufreq feedback into account Lukasz Luba
2023-12-12 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] thermal/cpufreq: Remove arch_update_thermal_pressure() Vincent Guittot
2023-12-15 15:38 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-12-12 14:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Rename arch_update_thermal_pressure into arch_update_hw_pressure Vincent Guittot
2023-12-14 8:31 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-12-14 8:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-12-14 8:54 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-12-14 8:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-12-14 8:22 ` [PATCH 0/5] Rework system pressure interface to the scheduler Lukasz Luba
2023-12-14 8:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-12-14 8:32 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-12-15 15:54 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231212142730.998913-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).