Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
	yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
	andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] perf/thunder_x2: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation from stack
Date: Tue,  2 Apr 2024 18:56:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240402105610.1695644-10-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402105610.1695644-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>

For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask
variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack
overflow.

Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate
cpumask var in config- neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.

Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.

Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
 drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c
index e16d10c763de..8a02a4533b32 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c
@@ -932,9 +932,9 @@ static int tx2_uncore_pmu_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu,
 static int tx2_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu,
 		struct hlist_node *hpnode)
 {
-	int new_cpu;
+	cpumask_var_t cpu_online_mask_temp;
 	struct tx2_uncore_pmu *tx2_pmu;
-	struct cpumask cpu_online_mask_temp;
+	int new_cpu;
 
 	tx2_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(hpnode,
 			struct tx2_uncore_pmu, hpnode);
@@ -945,17 +945,21 @@ static int tx2_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu,
 	if (tx2_pmu->hrtimer_callback)
 		hrtimer_cancel(&tx2_pmu->hrtimer);
 
-	cpumask_copy(&cpu_online_mask_temp, cpu_online_mask);
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_online_mask_temp);
-	new_cpu = cpumask_any_and(
-			cpumask_of_node(tx2_pmu->node),
-			&cpu_online_mask_temp);
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_online_mask_temp, GFP_KERNEL))
+		return 0;
+
+	cpumask_copy(cpu_online_mask_temp, cpu_online_mask);
+	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask_temp);
+	new_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(tx2_pmu->node),
+				  cpu_online_mask_temp);
 
 	tx2_pmu->cpu = new_cpu;
 	if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-		return 0;
+		goto __free_cpumask;
 	perf_pmu_migrate_context(&tx2_pmu->pmu, cpu, new_cpu);
 
+__free_cpumask:
+	free_cpumask_var(cpu_online_mask_temp);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02 10:56 [PATCH 0/9] perf: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation from stack Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 11:06   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf/arm-cmn: " Dawei Li
2024-04-05 14:30   ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf/arm_cspmu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf/arm_dsu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 23:58   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-03  1:43   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf/dwc_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf/hisi_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf/hisi_uncore: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf/qcom_l2: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li [this message]
2024-04-02 11:12 ` [PATCH 0/9] perf: " Mark Rutland
2024-04-02 13:40   ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 14:41     ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 10:41       ` Dawei Li
2024-04-03 11:10         ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240402105610.1695644-10-dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
    --to=dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox