Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Cc: xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
	yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
	andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] perf/hisi_uncore: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 20:51:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240403125109.2054881-9-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403125109.2054881-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>

For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask
variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack
overflow.

Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate
cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.

But dynamic allocation in cpuhp's teardown callback is somewhat problematic
for if allocation fails(which is unlikely but still possible):
- If -ENOMEM is returned to caller, kernel crashes for non-bringup
  teardown;
- If callback pretends nothing happened and returns 0 to caller, it may
  trap system into an in-consisitent/compromised state;

Use newly-introduced cpumask_any_and_but() to address all issues above.
It eliminates usage of temporary cpumask var in generic way, no matter how
the cpumask var is allocated.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
 drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
index 04031450d5fe..ccc9191ad1b6 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
@@ -504,7 +504,6 @@ int hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 {
 	struct hisi_pmu *hisi_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct hisi_pmu,
 						     node);
-	cpumask_t pmu_online_cpus;
 	unsigned int target;
 
 	if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus))
@@ -518,9 +517,8 @@ int hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	hisi_pmu->on_cpu = -1;
 
 	/* Choose a new CPU to migrate ownership of the PMU to */
-	cpumask_and(&pmu_online_cpus, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus,
-		    cpu_online_mask);
-	target = cpumask_any_but(&pmu_online_cpus, cpu);
+	target = cpumask_any_and_but(&hisi_pmu->associated_cpus,
+				     cpu_online_mask, cpu);
 	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-03 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 12:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] perf: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack Dawei Li
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] cpumask: add cpumask_any_and_but() Dawei Li
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:16   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] perf/arm-cmn: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:23   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] perf/arm_cspmu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:21   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] perf/arm_dsu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:32   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] perf/dwc_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:33   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] perf/hisi_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:35   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-05  9:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-03 12:51 ` Dawei Li [this message]
2024-04-03 14:35   ` [PATCH v2 08/10] perf/hisi_uncore: " Mark Rutland
2024-04-05  9:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] perf/qcom_l2: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:36   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] perf/thunderx2: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:38   ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] perf: " Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 16:11   ` Dawei Li
2024-04-03 16:39     ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240403125109.2054881-9-dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
    --to=dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox