From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653FB20BB5C; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729890454; cv=none; b=p5+iZnQo1Qfmw2TuK2rvaWHqM9mLdhC6tTA+rhxUgHHcYdFHmws6h33kJCfUsN5AcrxUNY4ixVwlbnZPeao9oxYx3IzNx3vF7gnyYTQcrrmAqwvE3uqJmR/NylfxtfqquTK2uIsq6BFdeFxwN8FFcW7HYJqiDJdTIkzyQEtX4wk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729890454; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gGK8EXx//dG9QBfHCEWNHrWMhtoIG8BxydlxXToXjMw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZA3zz8AodleiHzTgUs25i/xr7i4u0UwLFRHsvBoap4HA+HRulZZet8DNxHRj4fyX9Kcon0e29gH2RCmj405kkYBf3yVXKp9ZI88NVcT6bdWKCdjtpPjxlZZ8s3dFYIuEykC8DJNIlPTcOav3Hn1HyPDuqoV1mvl0R7DpgpRYuXo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FWiT0Xzf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FWiT0Xzf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729890452; x=1761426452; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gGK8EXx//dG9QBfHCEWNHrWMhtoIG8BxydlxXToXjMw=; b=FWiT0Xzf7FS8fNstxX4EWyC/a6wfmyLjrhNH1rzvbDHBbBrBbffbGDJm SRV9hunNW03yDL9Q06CGXddQzdnvLqVwZ+4EGVO6ntRuSNF1QTkZ+apbb I6ygIsxLQUvN5kw8vAZod+63XkJj6Xfhkr7gTazh2xNTjejSKSSAnPXic pVIBMz44Q4l63UrKFkzY5wTOyEU7TImmfrl7/92lwaFGTAf2Si7efsIl4 9eqRSKOVIq6shuBd1GTOQCsfmYj22+NvR3ygtxR8d8Cap43Wd4Jooftfp 16J8YD0cPhOzxSJdbY4ocF/CESAVPmUfSUTL5EdvW9CQMZMVwMwmaTX+e g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IKLnzVw0QjKlSgraQy9KlQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gDJwt4eKQpObw9GZrvZ+PA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11236"; a="40189898" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,232,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="40189898" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2024 14:07:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: v0/eymLOSSicaUdy5+b0aA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: JINDhuP5Se6vXwIo+J7S5g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,232,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="118494132" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2024 14:07:30 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t4RWq-000Yte-04; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:07:28 +0000 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 05:06:51 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Eugen Hristev , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eugen Hristev Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: Rework BCM_TCS_CMD macro Message-ID: <202410260419.qGKBvJHZ-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241025084823.475199-1-eugen.hristev@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241025084823.475199-1-eugen.hristev@linaro.org> Hi Eugen, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v6.12-rc4 next-20241025] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eugen-Hristev/soc-qcom-Rework-BCM_TCS_CMD-macro/20241025-165212 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025084823.475199-1-eugen.hristev%40linaro.org patch subject: [PATCH] soc: qcom: Rework BCM_TCS_CMD macro config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410260419.qGKBvJHZ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410260419.qGKBvJHZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410260419.qGKBvJHZ-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h:9, from drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:13: drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c: In function 'clk_rpmh_bcm_send_cmd': >> include/soc/qcom/tcs.h:71:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'u32_encode_bits' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 71 | (u32_encode_bits(commit, BCM_TCS_CMD_COMMIT_MASK) | \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:270:28: note: in expansion of macro 'BCM_TCS_CMD' 270 | cmd.data = BCM_TCS_CMD(1, enable, 0, cmd_state); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/u32_encode_bits +71 include/soc/qcom/tcs.h 68 69 /* Construct a Bus Clock Manager (BCM) specific TCS command */ 70 #define BCM_TCS_CMD(commit, valid, vote_x, vote_y) \ > 71 (u32_encode_bits(commit, BCM_TCS_CMD_COMMIT_MASK) | \ 72 u32_encode_bits(valid, BCM_TCS_CMD_VALID_MASK) | \ 73 u32_encode_bits((__force u32)cpu_to_le32(vote_x), \ 74 BCM_TCS_CMD_VOTE_X_MASK) | \ 75 u32_encode_bits((__force u32)cpu_to_le32(vote_y), \ 76 BCM_TCS_CMD_VOTE_Y_MASK)) 77 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki