From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874A414600C for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732897833; cv=none; b=hGdG6FzTYvZo2abOxMNorgGxWUQgb0MpUi53cu8iW+aAX0aNgD+OFr2Fn5z1zDVhBCiX8jA/CMCqpu/Ta7wwWsadFDA0K1TV5R7vWJcsgd7BZRw5TTfksIXeCJebiqngbBanYgxjEc8bruRJzACGZDnbDxQu5JoZdQDTS0asR1U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732897833; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4LUwpfrnHFkQR7mkasG/yVhtbXt53mi0rkc8s6chCjM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=s0+h6g3XqjsyzO5KyKpib8jqpVX+H3ujj89vx+KyzoKgetOjWLZQcVsJRONCpX06KjfugP2R0L4Lqn4IbTuVOnPylOy4WC3LFbg3DNywbhE+PJ52N3ojRBS4Nwfr00h5Z6iisjfQkEzoAQdJ/L/Tzngf/i7BUsSnXFKuJEPzsfo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=WfDzfvLM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="WfDzfvLM" Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7252f48acf2so1473407b3a.2 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:30:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1732897831; x=1733502631; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QyeRJ0oZlkItp/9Z/e7gPKi87niWzmGMkQiYND8MHPw=; b=WfDzfvLMod+EfZk3ofLK6Onxu8f1JIqIgCo4zuKhf1lmn4K35Ecx7IdTZ/kE4hUjgC 7QAt6BN7WIWPzD3A8rWGcv+oCk9AI1sZvx9ejQnzbee4z7UlXtHKxrOF80R31uKK8vc5 6Mn6HwBhCovQbPVizoIpYAcVL/5kF/TZSR0EU9Wgqk6/n6sewkCa6e66mpF+wPs+2SQr DAx4LxXpkD1qI7q3q/cUkLAQOaEaSyTTLfJQtqZPLOm8BxNZYY5rw81FWZEVb6ObafPM aT0M9Oz9gVFpeMCJtbm7/Cd1H4eR9BkeSpYc9791R8SRXwRkaUBBgYDh3CiaoOxRiBEB uvZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732897831; x=1733502631; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QyeRJ0oZlkItp/9Z/e7gPKi87niWzmGMkQiYND8MHPw=; b=vYezfCIJXcPBAT5qOIp0/sgvBjaYABSDLr6MwvF14U26FvqybwQya7nzEzDflaYSe9 gNAtQBghAK2K1BstknG3vY9QtY12oSjVFFrb+Kox8CnXoBwXcwH7I6ZdGq2wPuVztRyG zVB1nOimzYSNSFOSQwMLIj6OfvaxoB/h6NKi/1dvU42dkQ9uA39hW7fnGewg6u3nJZeM Jhfzf9a42KP5KBzzCwMv4vbbmORVb4hiV3yVvETG749fF1QNgYDoCLV3JNttV12hDUKf LrD2jkyCuE52KYK6p7dxvCgrykE9whifqebgKD/4q7GZfiIpXDXLtw5pcyCCdsw7R2t9 s9Yw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUBSw/AmX3Gj/YShvYVQxNyZcnidrKHnb1zlwr9NKjGMP+MEF+DI3HzGeEEfngbAJ6WtbAL7UTZELuleXvB@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxLE9kpDZJRNNuCEpPcCVo3Rbbe2ZFiJWkpuhfXDILyREfZ/Kul W+NTJv91C8XC2HwZnzAR22KkqPDPY/wcQkWRMEXO72Fng2QgAnDkTYmZCxeKG1VArO+wsAClyzs = X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctYhu5ULy1sF0H0YsohKHRfCcuuQFULWIYkF9HPO+otBFNpyNLgRK3nHsF18qL 4/IMFcKhP/wWYAD426asUQOPPACbPbDXfbtgaBvgVYOGHI+fdNpb3NLSv2VGL69AcS8Uh2uqYGg RAf0UIgy32YLL2NBORHsZyaAedTbDnI1gDzL2kz5+mE8KN5yXCkOoGSf2Q4wOWv2JWXAuxuyIO0 ZLeaMOSXz49/Z6KoTQlqMv+BU1Ojq0phpi8Yvc5F6BitZXspcDmlhadX1AG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH/b79cT3F2/ZbtOtbSBA5CGpMCFdRTUFf0LguaqMw2cMJZe8pECNxkpAmdc42N2WE/pRPSOA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b45:b0:725:7a8:6f7c with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7253017ba1amr16472888b3a.26.1732897830504; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:30:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from thinkpad ([120.60.57.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72541828c61sm3677043b3a.163.2024.11.29.08.30.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:30:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:00:24 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Damien Le Moal Cc: kw@linux.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, lpieralisi@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, aman1.gupta@samsung.com, p.rajanbabu@samsung.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Fix the return value of IOCTL Message-ID: <20241129163024.dvz2ojldopeoyr6c@thinkpad> References: <20241129092415.29437-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20241129092415.29437-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 07:51:30PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 11/29/24 18:24, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > IOCTLs are supposed to return 0 for success and negative error codes for > > failure. Currently, this driver is returning 0 for failure and 1 for > > success, that's not correct. Hence, fix it! > > > > Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YvzNg5ROnxEApDgS@kroah.com > > Fixes: 2c156ac71c6b ("misc: Add host side PCI driver for PCI test function device") > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > Looks OK to me. > > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal > > One nit below. > > [...] > > > static void pci_endpoint_test_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) > > diff --git a/tools/pci/pcitest.c b/tools/pci/pcitest.c > > index 470258009ddc..545e04ad63a2 100644 > > --- a/tools/pci/pcitest.c > > +++ b/tools/pci/pcitest.c > > @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ > > > > #include > > > > -static char *result[] = { "NOT OKAY", "OKAY" }; > > static char *irq[] = { "LEGACY", "MSI", "MSI-X" }; > > > > struct pci_test { > > @@ -52,63 +51,65 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test) > > ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_BAR, test->barnum); > > fprintf(stdout, "BAR%d:\t\t", test->barnum); > > if (ret < 0) > > - fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n"); > > + fprintf(stdout, "NOT OKAY\n"); > > else > > - fprintf(stdout, "%s\n", result[ret]); > > + fprintf(stdout, "OKAY\n"); > > Maybe replace all this "if (ret < 0) ... else ..." and all the ones below with > something a call to: > > static void test_result(int ret) > { > fprintf(stdout, "%sOKAY\n", ret < 0 ? "NOT " : ""); > } > > or simply with the call: > > fprintf(stdout, "%sOKAY\n", ret < 0 ? "NOT " : ""); > > to avoid all these repetition. > Sounds good to me. Will incorporate in next version, thanks! - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்