From: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
To: dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: abel.vesa@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
mitltlatltl@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater: rework reg override handler
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 16:14:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250426081424.422590-1-mitltlatltl@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q6zqfk3l2khp3tkodxd4pzhufiesyjcypl66zoqzslolwoveyo@ltrw2iulrkqs>
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 3:41 AM Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:02:01PM +0800, Pengyu Luo wrote:
> > In downstream tree, many registers need to be overridden, it varies
> > from devices and platforms, with these registers getting more, adding
> > a handler for this is helpful.
>
> It should be noted that previously all values were applied during _init
> phase, before checking the status etc. Now the overrides are programmed
> from the set_mode. Should you still program sane defaults at the init
> stage too?
>
I think programming in set_mode is ok. When we init(dwc3_core_init), we
set_mode(dwc3_core_init_mode) later, please check
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14.3/source/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c#L2287
Actually, in the downstream, all the things are done in init, it
overrides first, then masked write the deaults, finally it set_mode,
you can check here
https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8650/blob/oneplus/sm8650_v_15.0.0_pad_pro/drivers/usb/repeater/repeater-qti-pmic-eusb2.c#L356
> BTW, is there a real need to override those for the platform you are
> working on? Could you please provide some details, maybe in the cover
> letter.
I am not quite sure, recently, I expirenced mode switching failure,
when I `echo device > /sys/kernel/debug/usb/a600000.usb/mode`, Ethernet
Gadget wouldn't work again, my desktop can't connect to it.
BTW, as you can see in line 356, it is most likely that overrides
related to charging feature. I have not ported charging yet, but adding
more overrides seems harmless, and if overriding, distinguishing which
mode seems necessary, even if some devices use the same sequence. So I
sent the patch.
Best wishes,
Pengyu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-26 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 12:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater: rework reg override handler Pengyu Luo
2025-04-16 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,snps-eusb2-repeater: Add more tuning overrides Pengyu Luo
2025-04-21 21:32 ` Rob Herring
2025-04-16 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater: rework reg override handler Pengyu Luo
2025-04-25 19:41 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-26 8:14 ` Pengyu Luo [this message]
2025-04-28 16:58 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-29 9:23 ` Pengyu Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250426081424.422590-1-mitltlatltl@gmail.com \
--to=mitltlatltl@gmail.com \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox