From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Krishna chaitanya chundru" <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>,
"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>,
"Laszlo Fiat" <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] PCI: qcom: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 11:26:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250505092603.286623-8-cassel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505092603.286623-6-cassel@kernel.org>
Commit 36971d6c5a9a ("PCI: qcom: Don't wait for link if we can detect Link
Up") changed so that we no longer call dw_pcie_wait_for_link(), and instead
enumerate the bus when receiving a Link Up IRQ.
Before 36971d6c5a9a, we called dw_pcie_wait_for_link(), and in the first
iteration of the loop, the link will never be up (because the link was just
started), dw_pcie_wait_for_link() will then sleep for LINK_WAIT_SLEEP_MS
(90 ms), before trying again.
This means that even if a driver was missing a msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS)
(100 ms), because of the call to dw_pcie_wait_for_link(), enumerating the
bus would essentially be delayed by that time anyway (because of the sleep
LINK_WAIT_SLEEP_MS (90 ms)).
While we could add the msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS) after deasserting PERST
(qcom already has an unconditional 1 ms sleep after deasserting PERST),
that would essentially bring back an unconditional delay during probe (the
whole reason to use a Link Up IRQ was to avoid an unconditional delay
during probe).
Thus, add the msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS) before enumerating the bus in the
IRQ handler. This way, for qcom SoCs that has a link up IRQ, we will not
have a 100 ms unconditional delay during boot for unpopulated PCIe slots.
Fixes: 36971d6c5a9a ("PCI: qcom: Don't wait for link if we can detect Link Up")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 6b18a2775e7f..5cef5e92b173 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -1646,6 +1646,7 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_pcie_global_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
if (FIELD_GET(PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP, status)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
+ msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
/* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-05 9:26 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 9:26 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-05-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: qcom: Replace PERST sleep time with proper macro Niklas Cassel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: qcom: " Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:34 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250505092603.286623-8-cassel@kernel.org \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=laszlo.fiat@proton.me \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox