From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m1973198.qiye.163.com (mail-m1973198.qiye.163.com [220.197.31.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9452DCC04 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 11:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760008844; cv=none; b=VxHShBojWqXOmSlFvUcLskh4+Zcu9eUUACH6Egkryi5G2xxspzPcWTKVpSN3/5wDsnV7GGWtt2tA6zvCb5Ca7If94iH5JbJ0HXFs9607e/otCqJlhJqarg/y/da0gWD3jszeSsQWY9gFAp600rpbJ4ppjIy3PU0IgaBVm1/sumU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760008844; c=relaxed/simple; bh=683eplXecpV3mO/PNwac7R2FamvLWw3mQ40wgkBfXdw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=nw5NOM7zQXmNwhXFNczYM56bnDuPwguMmv/l6FouwQHCg6UredP5Jg1GyCmMzSyzeK47EF+YjsPOW2gAmElpWKhh1XB7DnLtbambYeOGHrBzduj0CJ4zKSxCIyOy3/DU0IKdBbgsvDkWmo9EoYdopQmcP2ZK9hYW+z+mX3rGrbs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b=JVhNqty+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b="JVhNqty+" Received: from ROG.lan (unknown [36.129.139.90]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 255210424; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 19:05:21 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: Hongyang Zhao To: krzk@kernel.org Cc: andersson@kernel.org, casey.connolly@linaro.org, christopher.obbard@linaro.org, hongyang.zhao@thundersoft.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, loic.minier@oss.qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: rubikpi3: Add qcs6490-rubikpi3 board dts Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 19:05:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20251009110510.23698-1-hongyang.zhao@thundersoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <92e387fe-9481-485b-ba1e-7eb6d520dc77@kernel.org> References: <92e387fe-9481-485b-ba1e-7eb6d520dc77@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Tid: 0a99c8a59cd509d5kunm0f93cca9fd8e06 X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFITzdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkaH0tDVk9NQh0YHkIaSR9KGVYVFAkWGhdVEwETFh oSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlITVVKSUJVSkhCVUJLWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVKS0lPT09IVUpLS1 VKQktLWQY+ DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=JVhNqty+DnbqpqxrrQWbgjsj//V0aS2v9fLKlzmTh/5GmN829t+5L+aFOIMUlKzr6+E2WjXnHX3JoPEkikgSCYQ7BOoTe7dHDCRUh3/MT2PgytPw1x0oV9tjno8mVULV1jRhxeCleQ3oO2T7HXX/9w86uGngiYTyH/EmFHXtyrg=; s=default; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thundersoft.com; v=1; bh=YGOvp9Ha0h33sEs1H8NBZDRRuubyE/Y9un70WVREDUs=; h=date:mime-version:subject:message-id:from; > On 30/09/2025 13:32, Hongyang Zhao wrote: > > Add binding for the Thundercomm RUBIK Pi 3 board, > > which is based on the Qualcomm Dragonwing QCS6490 SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao > >
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people > and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older > kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base > your patches on recent Linux kernel. > > Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of > people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some > ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel > (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be > fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new > patches to the patchset. > > You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be > tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be > a waste of time. > > Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries. >
> > Best regards, > Krzysztof Thank you very much. Understood. I will make the adjustments and resend the new patch. However, since the discussion on [PATCH v4 1/2] is still ongoing, I should wait a few days before sending it. -- Thanks, Hongyang