From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_varada@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable ICE support for non-cmdq eMMC devices
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:35:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113173500.GE1792@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dbea629d-5aa9-4a85-6316-25ac82a33520@quicinc.com>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 12:41:28PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> > > + if (mrq->crypto_ctx) {
> > > + if (!msm_host->ice_init_done) {
> > > + sdhci_msm_non_cqe_ice_init(host);
> > > + msm_host->ice_init_done = true;
> > > + }
> >
> > This means sdhci_msm_ice_enable() is called only once per host
> > controller. It looks like the existing call to sdhci_msm_ice_enable()
> > happens each time after the host controller is resumed. So there seems
> > to be an inconsistency there. Which way is correct?
> Thank you for highlighting this. After revisiting the code paths, I believe
> the behavior is consistent across both CQE and non-CQE modes.
> ICE is re-enabled on every resume via the common sdhci_msm_runtime_resume()
> → sdhci_msm_ice_resume() → qcom_ice_resume() → sdhci_msm_ice_enable() path.
> The ice_init_done flag only governs one-time initialization in
> sdhci_msm_ice_cfg() and doesn’t interfere with the resume logic.
>
> In summary:
> CQE mode: ICE enabled during sdhci_msm_cqe_enable() + every resume
> Non-CQE mode: ICE enabled on first crypto request + every resume
I was looking at sdhci_msm_cqe_enable(). Based on the caller, it seems
to be a per-resume thing too. So it doesn't seem consistent.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 10:46 [PATCH v4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable ICE support for non-cmdq eMMC devices Md Sadre Alam
2025-11-11 17:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-11-13 5:51 ` Md Sadre Alam
2025-11-11 20:52 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-13 7:11 ` Md Sadre Alam
2025-11-13 17:35 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-11-17 7:21 ` Md Sadre Alam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251113173500.GE1792@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_varada@quicinc.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).