From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE613054C3; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 19:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764271771; cv=none; b=aUa3pcIxgK8Nt8xitnNk0aNgwl8MtPjJXGb+YwIa7goANxBrHwEyT6Gs/gAKQDz8CW+qbM8ag12PWk4SC0X/guhE+XrSXxLb1obeN8MyMIdaAUPygSWELFUMCT9nPVrgK30wgguH3KL4QovKJr57YDnPvM1nGW4k5lePCoJGicg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764271771; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3dA7eKTdIK6Z2EWuL1CUxNnWxGO002dwKrQWaVzfMQ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GAuinSJDWzTtgj6p41/WIbbW0Nzyv6BE5cRAv37x+0PFsf1G4NrFdrNTYPF4PTbvSvOlffa69ZsazWSp5ckTCm7FmJsgIvGqwTp8PQcpQAF0gaUdmNcoRK8ktWQdTpbya0k7U+if8I5BqGVpsxjCtk5EhvkHbeKj4Rcwm+O1AjA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=A5pbYQ+/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="A5pbYQ+/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764271770; x=1795807770; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=3dA7eKTdIK6Z2EWuL1CUxNnWxGO002dwKrQWaVzfMQ4=; b=A5pbYQ+/5bEabKU6Pwa29JdSZFStsp1+JG1QBnvmwA+XwswCELux9N7m wo0GzrVqzrb/7kzItf/jQlFleM6LSFLqmEGzMvljpVNlrtgvZEj67zrdW UXQPzm0El/7gSzAmeTiWbo7mH4cbfZ/TbuIpBiEbOtOiLLjJwnBWeBsZf U8hGgO7IBSn6prZCtg8vKXkfhgK4UjoSN9NXhUit1DFSZlj+FWkn7ugcl A2xfPI0xYc/5h8/8/gPDi5XasKj4PBRo3E6657UcxS5Toirlnjje1w7u7 U2lP+08yxGTjmszfwrGP0IdNsScwT5TnATlzCu7j24lQHScnuzeUEu0nR g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2RNXEew2RcihRxaa1JbINA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dXqp8H0+SHG3At9lusjGOg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11626"; a="66393948" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,231,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="66393948" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Nov 2025 11:29:29 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 19qKVL8VTRiNqYXMIIEb/Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wQwkhhWVRfmX8dHiJ7yaxw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,231,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="197607869" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 4664bbef4914) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Nov 2025 11:29:26 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 4664bbef4914 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vOhgC-000000005Zv-1iSb; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 19:29:24 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 03:29:06 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Taniya Das , Bjorn Andersson , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Ajit Pandey , Imran Shaik , Jagadeesh Kona , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Taniya Das Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Update the clock suffix for Glymur Message-ID: <202511280306.L2l4tAmD-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251125-glymur_rpmhcc_fix-v1-1-60081b3cce7f@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251125-glymur_rpmhcc_fix-v1-1-60081b3cce7f@oss.qualcomm.com> Hi Taniya, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 92fd6e84175befa1775e5c0ab682938eca27c0b2] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Taniya-Das/clk-qcom-clk-rpmh-Update-the-clock-suffix-for-Glymur/20251126-021404 base: 92fd6e84175befa1775e5c0ab682938eca27c0b2 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251125-glymur_rpmhcc_fix-v1-1-60081b3cce7f%40oss.qualcomm.com patch subject: [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Update the clock suffix for Glymur config: arm64-randconfig-003-20251127 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251128/202511280306.L2l4tAmD-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251128/202511280306.L2l4tAmD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511280306.L2l4tAmD-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:891:21: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a2'? 891 | [RPMH_RF_CLK3] = &clk_rpmh_clk3_a.hw, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | clk_rpmh_clk3_a2 >> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:892:22: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a_ao' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a2_ao'? 892 | [RPMH_RF_CLK3_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk3_a_ao.hw, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | clk_rpmh_clk3_a2_ao >> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:893:21: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a2'? 893 | [RPMH_RF_CLK4] = &clk_rpmh_clk4_a.hw, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | clk_rpmh_clk4_a2 >> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:894:22: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a_ao' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a2_ao'? 894 | [RPMH_RF_CLK4_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk4_a_ao.hw, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | clk_rpmh_clk4_a2_ao >> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:895:21: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a2'? 895 | [RPMH_RF_CLK5] = &clk_rpmh_clk5_a.hw, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | clk_rpmh_clk5_a2 >> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:896:22: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a_ao' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a2_ao'? 896 | [RPMH_RF_CLK5_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk5_a_ao.hw, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | clk_rpmh_clk5_a2_ao vim +891 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c c035a9e265dd80 Taniya Das 2024-12-04 887 ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 888 static struct clk_hw *glymur_rpmh_clocks[] = { ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 889 [RPMH_CXO_CLK] = &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 890 [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A] = &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2_ao.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @891 [RPMH_RF_CLK3] = &clk_rpmh_clk3_a.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @892 [RPMH_RF_CLK3_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk3_a_ao.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @893 [RPMH_RF_CLK4] = &clk_rpmh_clk4_a.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @894 [RPMH_RF_CLK4_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk4_a_ao.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @895 [RPMH_RF_CLK5] = &clk_rpmh_clk5_a.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @896 [RPMH_RF_CLK5_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk5_a_ao.hw, ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 897 }; ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 898 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki