From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 509D137B40E; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770283090; cv=none; b=avXD+LWTwO7rlUbHaxE8IL88axdvrlUfZVWWU1qu7Vr1Cbwo/ozqsCVLTHYDxkaqM+TyMsiYY4LN0T53x3saVP3hZEbPls+j/ulhdbDeLR+UTEynnYUs1tkE7owoO0bQZ07ZiRMr8owZj0GEuplovizCbVsZcfbV5fstNF+GMXw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770283090; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MIondRexAFNOOZkAfp9HG0MC0jg45UwMMDTDXejN0W4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qahRasR74nfjE+cmtg/xFAkGFTtiQcv1YqModTHKUbZNOEPl7GkXcirqfqXF+AblQcTMvQpffWcyxskrrxQVDRL+Yg0uB2BBdG3QT3VGyzAAft0hChtAQsG9Djv6JYq1agCTHXocJfUwKFgVHY1bC1PDDFBa4y/voNxnt/ti7MA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZqPt3txF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZqPt3txF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A83DC4CEF7; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:18:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770283089; bh=MIondRexAFNOOZkAfp9HG0MC0jg45UwMMDTDXejN0W4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZqPt3txFj+aJc2xLHLkLeHaSqTbPO6PH/7h36YygQaNtCFQodBjhp2rOxNJpQSYnm PLBWe5r2+YX9LeAehSfe9RR/SbrtSMhXgqeBKffjEspgHfAJgzeXTdXkdQtu3aU7X7 xQyV2fVSxjOZ3iwMQ6ZOZ5UjyCXtA9DGT8cpkUy2AnSD/UvYpLC6mv0JcwdAGNykX7 X8PMP7St0ILEGgBwGHu8BQcYPzw6Yz9cbu6ZbsCGcTKAoxG7Ev/V0XfUO0R4xhsU/k BUgz7BuMeQmCVSPwxoA7mELlktMONTi+ivYqlxugjxHTNKfWWQ3TTAL75KqB2HpEYW Byvuoo+ETupPw== Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:18:07 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Rajendra Nayak , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: sram: describe the IPQ5424 IMEM as mmio-sram Message-ID: <20260205-classic-cute-panda-a97bad@quoll> References: <20260130-wdt_reset_reason-v6-0-417ab789cd97@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260130-wdt_reset_reason-v6-1-417ab789cd97@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260130-wdt_reset_reason-v6-1-417ab789cd97@oss.qualcomm.com> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 04:14:30PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote: > Based on the discussion in the linux-arm-msm list, it is not > appropriate to define the IMEM (On-Chip SRAM) as syscon or MFD. 3rd party discussions without any references are not valid reason. You Best regards, Krzysztof