From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653604657FD; Fri, 15 May 2026 10:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778841944; cv=none; b=r4EifZOC+MiCmXwLj9LDLAz1yn0+TStA3xSpr9/yeJz902YtB/lHwkF2pqwtB3EdcHGcPP+UUQpRgRxQGIpI83RS25VGtiz5AOy66a90O/pmwpBvKEXtp7v+h3vnL1MnVxPcxFDhaM2SvGZ4Q1rdpWhgg2RHvNpADksIu6bBBgY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778841944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aFquNM6aEohbhTDbb4fuTNng9STE3xERl1DrIga1r1Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AnZeJwfKOmeCSc7ii7g9sEV9BGBS4keOZIeOTbRueT0EmKanHOhY8I3VM0GR8AV1WTILkcwmP/UPxe542GkO+ZY9OVK+9SBMz3wbp0RrZ1l1esX78/fn7gGYGdP4Xlx8t3OuFtH82Il5cnCX0TBr9uKz1qDoi+QfS7TJjrSOUnk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=a3lFiZQL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="a3lFiZQL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 905CDC2BCB0; Fri, 15 May 2026 10:45:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778841944; bh=aFquNM6aEohbhTDbb4fuTNng9STE3xERl1DrIga1r1Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a3lFiZQLScfSinIM92f7c/vg/GnJQOjtrGB4/SDgFIYZrvBwOONX6ukCUdV+9hScj 6NyCX5JmIZe0o0QiCPYIl5uMuRoKGy01+w54DhympqAnpD5zcDDP1TiVLYKSsBSJH6 3ZL4nWcXANvhvIYG+SBQuxPQW3JToKHdRzi9uBqDw1/YSG8zap+Yb0gN3neArjGMlt rBcdava9VXEv/eFrsjwUmGoDVhE2cz1CHazsoF4LtQtxBItum1ZUcEWabjx1f3mzrT pi+X6lRYyqf70nao3+2rI01xu5rccELFDO/uoxGIa55lZDafa5DSnAnIbw2tlIO9UF ItTPuVQE550xw== Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 12:45:41 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Varadarajan Narayanan Cc: Vinod Koul , Neil Armstrong , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: Document the ipq5210 QMP PCIe PHY Message-ID: <20260515-enlightened-flat-hippo-bc84de@quoll> References: <20260514-pci-phy-v1-0-482429192746@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260514-pci-phy-v1-1-482429192746@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260514-pci-phy-v1-1-482429192746@oss.qualcomm.com> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 09:28:28AM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Document the PCIe phy on the ipq5210 platform using the ipq9574 bindings > as a fallback, since the PCIe phy on the ipq5210 is similar to ipq9574. I don't understand that. You claim to use fallback only because they are "similar", which is clearly incomplete reason. Many things are similar. And your driver explicitly does not use fallback, which MUST be explained WHY. Best regards, Krzysztof