Re:Re:Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/bridge: Pass down connector to drm bridge detect hook

["Andy Yan" <andyshrk@163.com>]

Ping......

At 2025-04-22 15:59:27, "Andy Yan" <andyshrk@163.com> wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>At 2025-03-21 17:48:04, "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
>>On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 04:53:38PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
>>> From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
>>> 
>>> In some application scenarios, we hope to get the corresponding
>>> connector when the bridge's detect hook is invoked.
>>> 
>>> In most cases, we can get the connector by drm_atomic_get_connector_for_encoder
>>> if the encoder attached to the bridge is enabled, however there will
>>> still be some scenarios where the detect hook of the bridge is called
>>> but the corresponding encoder has not been enabled yet. For instance,
>>> this occurs when the device is hot plug in for the first time.
>>> 
>>> Since the call to bridge's detect is initiated by the connector, passing
>>> down the corresponding connector directly will make things simpler.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
>>
>>FTR, I'm against it and would have appreciated that you wait for a
>>meaningful closure to the discussion we've had on this.
>
>Can we start to review this patch? Since it's been almost a month now and
>no one has raised any objection to Dmitry's suggestion[1].
>
>
>[1]https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/vw2ncdomx3rwltb2xlo6nf3rapgcdtcjcodofgmecrzzabf7ji@pybsfv27jkq2/
>
>
>>
>>Maxime