From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 4/9] vfio: platform: add support for ACPI probe Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:01:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20f7d42e-8d15-49ad-6c6a-eda489546f20@codeaurora.org> References: <1466437879-32182-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1466437879-32182-5-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20160623123410.647b3be0@t450s.home> <604722bb-5e82-851f-c1a1-cb34b55bf77d@codeaurora.org> <20160713140956.5aad0904@t450s.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160713140956.5aad0904@t450s.home> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Williamson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Baptiste Reynal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 7/13/2016 4:09 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: >> et me explain the rationale. >> > >> > As you know, there can be two kernel build combinations. One build where >> > ACPI is not selected in Kconfig and another one with the ACPI Kconfig. >> > >> > In the first case, CONFIG_ACPI is stubbed out in this file and DT user >> > will not see any kind of messages from ACPI. >> > >> > In the second case, both DT and ACPI is compiled in but the system is booting with >> > any of these combinations. >> > >> > If the firmware is DT type, then acpi_disabled is 1. The ACPI probe routine >> > terminates immediately without any messages. >> > >> > If the firmware is ACPI type, then acpi_disabled is 0. All other checks are valid >> > checks. We cannot claim that this system is DT. > > Thanks, this sort of information and assumption should be documented in > a comment since not all of us care whether a DT device can appear in an > ACPI config or not. Also note that acpi_disabled and ACPI_COMPANION > are defined regardless of CONFIG_ACPI, so really we only need to wrap > acpi_device_hid() in an #ifdef, we could skip the separate stub. > Thanks, Sure, I'll add the sentences above as a comment to top of the probe function. I also got rid of stub vfio_platform_acpi_probe function and moved CONFIG_ACPI inside the vfio_platform_acpi_probe function as you suggested. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.