From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0C4494A0F; Wed, 6 May 2026 15:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778082035; cv=none; b=BNH6ENyC17KoEkuWJlghWcAI0oTTKq9a09eDQi25piueplQRQIg+o1+XtTfdyomUQBje6Gc1KR6ZOtlzGMLPGWlowLs+nCASuNlqrQ171gkfWQvx/ym3OxRj7fNa/GZDEdET7nMM7JdUfl23DSf1mYL6CtFTdDOvzAi83oNsU8Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778082035; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bHXOtIzqT8aOSc77byfk93z12RxtohGmdl0a/NUjWzU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=W35rHheS0ocyknXPrP+OIldwFTuDJDLGpIhX7a0oDjLpkXIG5eL2qTP/aQjnJj9R/i2bWsWzcniu837NgvtIG0ow2CfZMpBTQiNIjsPl3FsoNlpcBFjV5PxOKRodJj0LSNk3pUgursEwTZchhlh/UU6mikXEQrQUEMf9XsjYC1w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=pTtyE1gt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="pTtyE1gt" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24B71A00; Wed, 6 May 2026 08:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.69.49] (unknown [10.57.69.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 993E63F7B4; Wed, 6 May 2026 08:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1778082029; bh=bHXOtIzqT8aOSc77byfk93z12RxtohGmdl0a/NUjWzU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=pTtyE1gtb59IOTxDCirzd886wiUYkHfrrdpGH1jR/zeOy1suieCwDv4WiMz5r9wPj Z9chez35XI2F+KicGm33sPSBp6scUbZOQONyEH/cUBN55N8Qsr50yWkZoqEZGfJHZN CDZR8sD/883aBHX6Ei0tlT6ZnKZ6D928YZis8a/s= Message-ID: <23c69bee-868d-4142-a96e-36de61f23f4f@arm.com> Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 16:40:22 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/panthor: Don't use the racy drm_gem_lru_remove() helper To: Boris Brezillon , Liviu Dudau , Dmitry Osipenko Cc: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Akash Goel , Chia-I Wu , Rob Clark , Dmitry Baryshkov , Abhinav Kumar , Jessica Zhang , Sean Paul , Marijn Suijten , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260506-panthor-shrinker-fixes-v1-0-e7721526de96@collabora.com> <20260506-panthor-shrinker-fixes-v1-1-e7721526de96@collabora.com> From: Steven Price Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <20260506-panthor-shrinker-fixes-v1-1-e7721526de96@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/05/2026 13:16, Boris Brezillon wrote: > drm_gem_lru_remove() dereference stores drm_gem_object::lru in a local > variable that's then dereferenced to acquire the LRU lock. Because this > assignment in done without the LRU lock held, it can race with s/in/is/ ^^ > drm_gem_lru_scan() where drm_gem_object::lru is temporarily assigned > a stack-allcated LRU that goes away when leaving the function. By > the time we dereference this local lru variable, the object might already > be gone. > > It feels like drm_gem_lru_move_tail() was never meant to be used this > way, because there's no easy way we can avoid this race unless we defer > the locking to the caller. Let's add an explicit LRU for unreclaimable > BOs instead, and have all BOs added to this LRU at creation time. > > Fixes: fb42964e2a76 ("drm/panthor: Add a GEM shrinker") > Reported-by: Chia-I Wu > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/work_items/86 > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu With minor typos fixed Reviewed-by: Steven Price Although an alternative would be to expose drm_gem_lru_remove_locked() in some form (maybe a wrapper which requires passing in the lock?) > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h | 10 ++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c | 5 ++++- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h > index 4e4607bca7cc..45b71546f83c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h > @@ -190,6 +190,16 @@ struct panthor_device { > /** @reclaim.lock: Lock protecting all LRUs */ > struct mutex lock; > > + /** > + * @reclaim.unreclaimable: unreclaimable BOs > + * > + * Either the BO is unreclaimable because it has no pages allocated, > + * or it's unreclaimable because pages are pinned. > + * > + * All BOs start in that list at creation time. s/that/this/ ^^^^ Thanks, Steve > + */ > + struct drm_gem_lru unreclaimable; > + > /** > * @reclaim.unused: BOs with unused pages > * > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c > index 13295d7a593d..8e31740126e7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void panthor_gem_update_reclaim_state_locked(struct panthor_gem_object *bo, > drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.gpu_mapped_shared, &bo->base); > break; > case PANTHOR_GEM_UNRECLAIMABLE: > - drm_gem_lru_remove(&bo->base); > + drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &bo->base); > break; > default: > drm_WARN(&ptdev->base, true, "invalid GEM reclaim state (%d)\n", new_state); > @@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ static struct panthor_gem_object * > panthor_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, uint32_t flags, > struct panthor_vm *exclusive_vm, u32 usage_flags) > { > + struct panthor_device *ptdev = container_of(dev, struct panthor_device, base); > struct panthor_gem_object *bo; > int ret; > > @@ -1026,6 +1027,7 @@ panthor_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, uint32_t flags, > } > > panthor_gem_debugfs_set_usage_flags(bo, usage_flags); > + drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &bo->base); > return bo; > > err_put: > @@ -1551,6 +1553,7 @@ int panthor_gem_shrinker_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev) > return ret; > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ptdev->reclaim.vms); > + drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &ptdev->reclaim.lock); > drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.unused, &ptdev->reclaim.lock); > drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.mmapped, &ptdev->reclaim.lock); > drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.gpu_mapped_shared, &ptdev->reclaim.lock); >