From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: foss@joelselvaraj.com, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <danielt@kernel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: qcom-wled: fix unbalanced ovp irq enable
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <280f1e92-36a1-450b-b6df-b36c3aed3c1c@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021-qcom-wled-fix-unbalanced-ovp-irq-enable-v2-1-7ff115b4ffe7@joelselvaraj.com>
On 10/21/25 8:53 PM, Joel Selvaraj via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Joel Selvaraj <foss@joelselvaraj.com>
>
> In Xiaomi Poco F1 and at least few other devices, the qcom wled driver
> triggers unbalanced ovp irq enable warning like the following during
> boot up.
>
> [ 1.151677] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 1.151680] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 176
> [ 1.151693] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 160 at kernel/irq/manage.c:774 __enable_irq+0x50/0x80
> [ 1.151710] Modules linked in:
> [ 1.151717] CPU: 0 PID: 160 Comm: kworker/0:11 Not tainted 5.17.0-sdm845 #4
> [ 1.151724] Hardware name: Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (DT)
> [ 1.151728] Workqueue: events wled_ovp_work
> ...<snip>...
> [ 1.151833] Call trace:
> [ 1.151836] __enable_irq+0x50/0x80
> [ 1.151841] enable_irq+0x48/0xa0
> [ 1.151846] wled_ovp_work+0x18/0x24
> [ 1.151850] process_one_work+0x1d0/0x350
> [ 1.151858] worker_thread+0x13c/0x460
> [ 1.151862] kthread+0x110/0x114
> [ 1.151868] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> [ 1.151876] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> Fix it by storing and checking the state of ovp irq before enabling and
> disabling it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Selvaraj <foss@joelselvaraj.com>
> ---
> I was able to debug the issue a little further. This happens mainly because
> devm_request_threaded_irq already enables the ovp irq during probe. Then ovp
> work gets scheduled when update_status happens and in turn enables the irq again.
> Tracking the status makes it easy to avoid the double irq enable. But I am
> open to try a different approach if there is any suggestion.
Would reverting this change and adding (| IRQF_NO_AUTOEN) to that call
fix it?
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-21 18:53 [PATCH v2] backlight: qcom-wled: fix unbalanced ovp irq enable Joel Selvaraj via B4 Relay
2025-10-22 17:14 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2025-10-28 12:40 ` Daniel Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=280f1e92-36a1-450b-b6df-b36c3aed3c1c@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=danielt@kernel.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=foss@joelselvaraj.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox