From: merez@codeaurora.org
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
merez@codeaurora.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
DOCUMENTATION <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mmc: block: Add write packing control
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:34:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31ba3fefcfc5352a6c41955a4e07ae8f.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pq7ungsw.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>
Hi Chris,
Is there anything else that holds this patch from being pushed to mmc-next?
Thanks,
Maya
On Tue, July 17, 2012 3:50 pm, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Muthu,
>
> On Mon, Jul 16 2012, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 15 2012, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>>>>> I've already replied to a later version of the patch, but just to get
>>>>> this comment in at the appropriate point of the discussion as well:
>>>>>
>>>>> Even though it would result in a cleaner sysfs, I don't want to do
>>>>> this now because it will break userspace scripts that are depending
>>>>> on the current locations of these attributes.
>>>>
>>>> Maya is adding a new sysfs attribute with that patch. So, there should
>>>> not be any user space stuff that depends on it.
>>>
>>> In the later patchset, Maya's "[PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: card: Move MMC
>>> specific attributes to mmc sub-directory" moves the existing attributes
>>> into the mmc/ directory.
>>>
>>> It's that move that I'm objecting to, rather than the creation of a new
>>> directory -- although since we're going to leave the current attributes
>>> where they are, it might not make sense to add the new directory.
>>>
>>> We'd be creating two places that people have to look for mmc-related
>>> attributes, which is arguably less clean than having one place to look
>>> even though it's mixed in with the other block device attributes.
>>
>> So, what is the plan for fixing the user land tools and cleaning this
>> up?
>
> At the moment I don't have any plan to do that, because the cure
> (potentially breaking userland scripts that are writing to some
> read/write attributes, by breaking ABI to move everything into a
> new directory) seems worse than the disease (having some attributes
> in a directory that isn't the ideal one).
>
> I'd be willing to explore something like Venkat's idea if the block
> layer maintainers insist, though.
>
> - Chris.
> --
> Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
> One Laptop Per Child
>
--
Sent by consultant of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 18:55 [PATCH v2 0/1] mmc: block: Add write packing control Maya Erez
2012-06-01 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Maya Erez
2012-06-08 9:37 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-06-09 14:46 ` merez
2012-06-11 9:10 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-06-11 13:55 ` merez
2012-06-11 14:39 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-06-11 20:10 ` merez
2012-06-12 4:16 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-06-11 17:19 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-06-11 20:19 ` merez
2012-06-12 4:07 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-06-11 21:19 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-12 0:28 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-12 20:08 ` merez
2012-06-13 19:52 ` merez
2012-06-13 22:21 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-14 7:46 ` merez
2012-07-14 19:12 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-16 1:49 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-07-16 2:46 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-16 16:44 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-07-17 22:50 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-18 6:34 ` merez [this message]
2012-07-18 7:26 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-19 0:33 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-07-17 4:15 ` S, Venkatraman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-12 19:05 merez
2012-07-23 11:43 merez
2012-07-23 12:22 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-24 8:44 merez
2012-07-24 20:23 ` merez
2012-07-24 20:52 ` merez
2012-07-26 15:28 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-26 18:54 ` merez
2012-07-27 9:07 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-08-27 18:28 ` merez
2012-08-28 17:40 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-09-06 5:17 ` merez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31ba3fefcfc5352a6c41955a4e07ae8f.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org \
--to=merez@codeaurora.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muthu.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).