From: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@quicinc.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <agross@kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <quic_kamalw@quicinc.com>,
<quic_jestar@quicinc.com>, <sboyd@kernel.org>,
<quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>, <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spmi: Add check for remove callback in spmi_drv_remove API
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:12:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <367fdcef-7360-055a-897b-71a66063b4ba@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5hqMFw0xl6lmJYL@kroah.com>
Hi Greg
These are two SPMI drivers without remove callbacks defined:
drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c
drivers/mfd/hi6421-spmi-pmic.c
We made this change after noticing an issue internally with the first
one above, there was a crash when trying to remove it with rmmod, which
is fixed by this change. In addition, since the probe of the QCOM SPMI
PMIC driver uses devm_ functions throughout, we could see that with this
change, when we remove the device with rmmod, the cleanup does happen
correctly even though there is no remove function defined in the driver.
The last function called in the probe of our SPMI PMIC driver is
devm_of_platform_populate(), to probe all the PMIC peripheral drivers
under this one, and when this driver module was removed with rmmod, we
could see that the individual PMIC drivers under it also got depopulated
with their remove APIs getting called.
If it is possible for a SPMI driver to be removed correctly by rmmod
without having a remove API defined, this change should be right, what
do you think?
Thanks,
Jishnu
On 12/13/2022 5:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 02:53:00PM +0530, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>> Add a check for remove callback presence before calling it for a
>> spmi driver, to avoid NULL pointer dereference error if remove callback
>> has not been specified for that SPMI driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
>> index a456ce5..6b34356 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
>> @@ -350,7 +350,8 @@ static void spmi_drv_remove(struct device *dev)
>> const struct spmi_driver *sdrv = to_spmi_driver(dev->driver);
>>
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>> - sdrv->remove(to_spmi_device(dev));
>> + if (sdrv->remove)
>> + sdrv->remove(to_spmi_device(dev));
>> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
>>
>> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>
> What in-kernel spmi driver does not have a remove function set that
> requires this change?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-04 9:22 [PATCH] Update spmi driver removal API Jishnu Prakash
2022-12-04 9:23 ` [PATCH] spmi: Add check for remove callback in spmi_drv_remove API Jishnu Prakash
2022-12-13 12:04 ` Greg KH
2022-12-13 13:42 ` Jishnu Prakash [this message]
2022-12-13 15:09 ` Greg KH
2022-12-21 5:39 ` Jishnu Prakash
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=367fdcef-7360-055a-897b-71a66063b4ba@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_jprakash@quicinc.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_jestar@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_kamalw@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox