Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Use highest corner until sync_state

[Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>]

On 8/10/2022 2:25 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 08 Aug 03:17 CDT 2022, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> 
>>
>> On 8/6/2022 9:20 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> In some cases the hardware that the bootloader has left configured
>>> depends on RPMH power domains for their operation up until the point
>>> where the related Linux device driver probes and can inherit that
>>> configuration, or power down the hardware gracefully.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately as Linux probes the releavant drivers in sequence there
>>> are periods during the Linux boot flow where either the genpd refcount
>>> will reach 0, or worse where the active performance_state votes does not
>>> meet the requirements of the state that the hardware was left in.
>>>
>>> One specific example of this is during boot of e.g. SM8150/SC8180X,
>>> where the display clock controller probes, without any particular
>>> performance state needs (to access its registers). This will drop the
>>> MMCX rail to MIN_SVS, which isn't sufficient to sustain the clock rates
>>> that the later probing MDP is configured to. This results in an
>>> unrecoverable system state.
>>>
>>> Handle both these cases by keeping the RPMH power-domais that are
>>> referenced voted for highest state, until sync_state indicates that all
>>> devices referencing the RPMH power-domain driver has been probed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
>>> index 092f6ab09acf..494bb6c75ed7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>>     * @res_name:		Resource name used for cmd-db lookup
>>>     * @addr:		Resource address as looped up using resource name from
>>>     *			cmd-db
>>> + * @state_synced:       Indicator that sync_state has been invoked for the rpmhpd resource
>>>     */
>>>    struct rpmhpd {
>>>    	struct device	*dev;
>>> @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ struct rpmhpd {
>>>    	bool		enabled;
>>>    	const char	*res_name;
>>>    	u32		addr;
>>> +	bool		state_synced;
>>>    };
>>>    struct rpmhpd_desc {
>>> @@ -493,7 +495,13 @@ static int rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(struct rpmhpd *pd, unsigned int corner)
>>>    	unsigned int this_active_corner = 0, this_sleep_corner = 0;
>>>    	unsigned int peer_active_corner = 0, peer_sleep_corner = 0;
>>> -	to_active_sleep(pd, corner, &this_active_corner, &this_sleep_corner);
>>> +	if (pd->state_synced) {
>>> +		to_active_sleep(pd, corner, &this_active_corner, &this_sleep_corner);
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		/* Clamp to highest corner if sync_state hasn't happened */
>>> +		this_active_corner = pd->level_count - 1;
>>> +		this_sleep_corner = pd->level_count - 1;
>>> +	}
>>>    	if (peer && peer->enabled)
>>>    		to_active_sleep(peer, peer->corner, &peer_active_corner,
>>> @@ -708,11 +716,36 @@ static int rpmhpd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    	return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(pdev->dev.of_node, data);
>>>    }
>>> +static void rpmhpd_sync_state(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct rpmhpd_desc *desc = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>>> +	struct rpmhpd **rpmhpds = desc->rpmhpds;
>>> +	unsigned int corner;
>>> +	struct rpmhpd *pd;
>>> +	unsigned int i;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&rpmhpd_lock);
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < desc->num_pds; i++) {
>>> +		pd = rpmhpds[i];
>>> +		if (!pd)
>>> +			continue;
>>> +
>>> +		pd->state_synced = true;
>> []
>>
>>> +		if (pd->enabled)
>>> +			corner = max(pd->corner, pd->enable_corner);
>>> +		else
>>> +			corner = 0;
>>> +		rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(pd, corner);
>>
>> can't this be
>> 		if (pd->enabled) {
>> 			corner = max(pd->corner, pd->enable_corner);
>> 			rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(pd, corner);
>> 		}
> 
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that would imply that if the
> power-domain was disabled by all clients when we hit the sync_state we
> would be left at max state until one of them tickles it again.
> 
> The way it's written here means that in addition to keeping things at
> the highest corner we also keep it on until sync_state hits - but no
> longer.

ah, that's right, seems like the right thing to do.

>>
>> also, we do check for return value of rpmhpd_aggregate_corner() but I guess
>> here there isn't much different we would do even if there is an error?
>>
> 
> You're right, ignoring the return value here means that an error would
> be completely silent. There's not much we can do about it, but it might
> be useful to the developer to know that this happened.
> 
> So a dev_err() seems in order.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bjorn
> 
>>> +	}
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&rpmhpd_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static struct platform_driver rpmhpd_driver = {
>>>    	.driver = {
>>>    		.name = "qcom-rpmhpd",
>>>    		.of_match_table = rpmhpd_match_table,
>>>    		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>>> +		.sync_state = rpmhpd_sync_state,
>>>    	},
>>>    	.probe = rpmhpd_probe,
>>>    };