From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
Cc: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] interconnect: qcom: rpm: make QoS INVALID default, separate out driver data
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:01:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449cdcb1-c2f9-7800-9451-cb2dc289b108@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230217-topic-icc-fixes-v5-v5-1-c9a550f9fdb9@linaro.org>
On 17/02/2023 10:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
I find this commit log difficult to understand.
Could you reduce it down ?
> Currently, NOC_QOS_MODE_FIXED is defined as 0x0, which makes it the
> "default" option (as that's what uninitialized members of partially
> initialized structs are set to), which should really have been
> NOC_QOS_MODE_INVALID, and that's what people (wrongly) assumed was
> the case when .qos.qos_mode was not defined and what really makes
> the most sense..
"Currently NOC_QOS_MODE_FIXED is defined as 0x0 which makes it the
default option. The default option however should be NOC_QOS_MODE_INVALID"
> That resulted in {port 0, prio 0, areq_prio 0, urg_fwd = false, rpm-voted}
> QoS being always voted for, because the code flow assumed "hey, it's fixed
> QoS, so let's just roll with whatever parameters are set" [again, set by
> partial struct initialization, as these fields were left unfilled by the
> developers]. That is of course incorrect, and on many of these platforms
> port 0 is MAS_APPS_PROC, which 9/10 times is supposed to be handled by
> the ap_owned path, not to mention the rest of the parameters may differ.
> Arguably, the APPS node is the most important one, next to EBI0..
This paragraph in particular is difficult to decipher, at least for me
with my native Dublinese
> The modes are defined as preprocessor constants. They are not used
> anywhere outside the driver or sent to any remote processor outside
> qcom_icc_set_noc_qos(), which is easily worked around.
> Separate the type specified in driver data from the value sent to msmbus.
> Make the former an enum for better mainainability.
>
> This is an implicit fix for every SMD RPM ICC driver that didn't
> explicitly specify NOC_QOS_MODE_INVALID on non-AP_owned nodes that
> don't have QoS settings.
It would be nice to reduce the commit log down to say three paragraphs
of no more than three sentences each.
---
bod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-23 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 10:46 [PATCH v5 00/10] The great interconnecification fixation Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] interconnect: qcom: rpm: make QoS INVALID default, separate out driver data Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-23 13:01 ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Add support for specifying channel num Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] interconnect: qcom: Sort kerneldoc entries Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Rename icc desc clocks to bus_blocks Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Rename icc provider num_clocks to num_bus_clocks Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Handle interface clocks Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Allow negative num_bus_clocks Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] interconnect: qcom: msm8996: Specify no bus clock scaling on A0NoC Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 19:27 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 19:53 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 20:26 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-17 20:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 22:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-23 14:07 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-02-23 14:17 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Don't use clk_get_optional for bus clocks anymore Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] interconnect: qcom: msm8996: Promote to core_initcall Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449cdcb1-c2f9-7800-9451-cb2dc289b108@linaro.org \
--to=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jun.nie@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
--cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox