From: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: mka@chromium.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Allow for regulators that can't be read at bootup
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 15:47:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4547e1cb-a39c-decd-9384-4e2c6d28f64d@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180515220717.254950-1-dianders@chromium.org>
On 05/15/2018 03:07 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> As discussed in the patches to try to support the RPMh regulators [1],
> the fact that regulators are write-only means that its driver's
> get_voltage_sel() should return an error code if it's called before
> any calls to set_voltage_sel(). This causes problems in
> machine_constraints_voltage() when trying to apply the constraints.
This problem specifically arises in the latest RPMh regulator patch [1] if
regulator-min-microvolt and regulator-max-microvolt are specified for a
VRM managed RPMh regulator device but the qcom,regulator-initial-microvolt
property is not provided. Therefore, listing
qcom,regulator-initial-microvolt is a way to avoid regulator registration
issues.
> In this patch I propose the error code -ENOTRECOVERABLE. In errno.h
> this error is described as "State not recoverable".
I'm fine with this constant. Hopefully Mark is as well.
> If this patch is accepted then we'll need to update the latest RPMh
> regulator patch to return it. The current patch returns -EINVAL which
> means that the regulator always fails.
I'll make this modification if needed.
Take care,
David
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/11/703
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20180515220717.254950-1-dianders@chromium.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4547e1cb-a39c-decd-9384-4e2c6d28f64d@codeaurora.org \
--to=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).