From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Mayurkumar Patel <mayurkumar.patel@intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] PCI/ASPM: reconfigure ASPM following hotplug for POLICY_DEFAULT
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:06:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48b14a37-3b5c-e128-aa96-b924d05b7636@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309222751.GD19517@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Hi Bjorn,
On 3/9/2017 5:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This is an aspect of the ASPM design that I don't like:
>
> - pcie_aspm_init_link_state() is called on a *bridge* after we've
> enumerated any devices below the bridge, and we allocate the
> link_state.
>
> - pcie_aspm_exit_link_state() is called on an *endpoint*, and if
> we're removing the last endpoint below a bridge, we release the
> *parent's* link_state.
I just posted V4 a minute ago. I divided ASPM init into two so that the
ASPM registers are captured in device_add path.
There is a section of the ASPM init code that needs to walk all the devices
under the bridge.
This section of the code is not working in device_add path as the link list
for child devices has not been set up yet.
Unless you tell me there is a better way to handle this, I don't see how
we can remove the call from scan_slot.
After further review, I think I can split PATCH V4 3/3 into two. Before
diving into too much clean up, I wanted to get some feedback as it is
obvious from the messed up cover letter.
Sinan
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 20:39 [PATCH V3] PCI/ASPM: reconfigure ASPM following hotplug for POLICY_DEFAULT Sinan Kaya
2017-03-09 22:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-10 14:36 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-13 8:49 ` Patel, Mayurkumar
2017-03-13 21:06 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48b14a37-3b5c-e128-aa96-b924d05b7636@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mayurkumar.patel@intel.com \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).