From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:18468 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752214Ab0GNPgx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:36:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4C3DD98C.2000302@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:36:44 -0700 From: Bryan Huntsman MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 0/2] Allow late mdesc detection References: <1278903792.387175.713057245098.0.gpush@pororo> <1278921935.9235.90.camel@pororo.lan> <20100713072848.GC19839@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1279011746.2521.394.camel@pororo.lan> <20100713093346.GC20590@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1279080712.15089.53.camel@pororo.lan> In-Reply-To: <1279080712.15089.53.camel@pororo.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jeremy Kerr Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Eric Miao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Pitre , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org > be useful without the DT. At present (and as far as I know), Grant and I > are the only ones doing DT-specific infrastructure changes for ARM. We did an evaluation of it a few months ago for MSM chips. IIRC, there were a lot of work-arounds needed to accommodate platform data and function pointers. The net result was not a decrease in board file size or complexity. I'll try to find the tree we used and host it somewhere for public review. - Bryan