From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4CD31E67.60107@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:58:15 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay() References: <1288300770-18350-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1288300770-18350-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1288899002.21823.3.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <1288899002.21823.3.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Walker Cc: Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Saravana Kannan , Colin Cross , Kevin Hilman , Santosh Shilimkar , Nicolas Pitre List-ID: On 11/04/2010 12:30 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:19 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> + >> +static void (*delay_fn)(unsigned long) = delay_loop; >> + >> +void set_delay_fn(void (*fn)(unsigned long)) >> +{ >> + delay_fn = fn; >> +} > > This needs to be a static inline in the header file. Wouldn't that mean delay_fn needs to be exposed in the header file too? I like the fact that it's static and scoped to this file. >> +/* >> + * loops = usecs * HZ * loops_per_jiffy / 1000000 >> + */ >> +void __delay(unsigned long loops) >> +{ >> + delay_fn(loops); >> +} >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay); > > Can we make this static inline also? I'm sure about the module issues.. Do you mean in the header file or in this file? I think it won't work because there actually needs to be a __delay symbol and it can't just be inlined away at all the call sites. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.