From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4CFFEB00.5090807@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:30:56 -0800 From: Stephen Boyd MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay() References: <1291783128-27520-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1291783128-27520-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1291836162.12568.17.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <4CFFE965.30906@codeaurora.org> <1291839992.12568.31.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <1291839992.12568.31.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Walker Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Saravana Kannan , Nicolas Pitre , John Stultz , Brian Swetland , Arve Hj?nnev?g List-ID: On 12/08/2010 12:26 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > The last time I thought you said there was no size change ? My tests > showed a decrease .. Oh, right. There was no size change when I moved __delay() into the header in addition to the others. > > What compiler optimizations are you talking about See Subject: Weirdo gcc 4.3.x behaviour Message-ID: <20101121191148.GA12234@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29950 -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.