From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/4] USB: core: OTG Supplement Revision 2.0 updates
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:23:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0A3609.7000002@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1012161028430.2061-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On 12/16/2010 9:04 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Pavankumar Kondeti wrote:
>
>> OTG supplement revision 2.0 spec introduces Attach Detection Protocol
>> (ADP) for detecting peripheral connection without applying power on
>> VBUS. ADP is optional and is included in the OTG descriptor along with
>> SRP and HNP.
>>
>> HNP polling is introduced for peripheral to notify its wish to become
>> host. Host polls (GET_STATUS on DEVICE) peripheral for host_request
>> and suspend the bus when peripheral returns host_request TRUE. The spec
>> insists the polling frequency to be in 1-2 sec range and bus should be
>> suspended within 2 sec from host_request is set.
>>
>> a_alt_hnp_support feature is obsolete and a_hnp_support feature is limited
>> to only legacy OTG B-device. The newly introduced bcdOTG field in the OTG
>> descriptor is used for identifying the 2.0 compliant B-device.
>
> This combination of things doesn't make sense:
>
>> index b9278a1..baada06 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
>> @@ -1270,6 +1282,47 @@ static int usb_resume_both(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_OTG
>> +void usb_hnp_polling_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>
> ...
>
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> usb_hnp_polling_work() is defined only when CONFIG_USB_OTG is set.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> index e70aeaf..5dd59e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> @@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ static void usb_bus_init (struct usb_bus *bus)
>> bus->bandwidth_isoc_reqs = 0;
>>
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD (&bus->bus_list);
>> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bus->hnp_polling, usb_hnp_polling_work);
>> }
>
> But its address is taken regardless of CONFIG_USB_OTG.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/usb.h b/drivers/usb/core/usb.h
>> index b975450..ffa16e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/usb.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/usb.h
>> @@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ static inline int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
>>
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_OTG
>> +extern void usb_hnp_polling_work(struct work_struct *work);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void usb_hnp_polling_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> Otherwise it is an empty inline routine.
>
> But taking the address of an inline routine forces the compiler to
> produce an out-of-line version. Therefore you might as well explicitly
> define usb_hnp_polling_work() as an empty function when CONFIG_USB_OTG
> isn't set.
>
Thanks. I got it. Will fix it next version.
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-16 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-16 11:08 [RFC v2 0/4] USB core changes for supporting OTG on MSM SoC Pavankumar Kondeti
2010-12-16 11:08 ` [RFC v2 1/4] USB: core: OTG Supplement Revision 2.0 updates Pavankumar Kondeti
2010-12-16 15:34 ` Alan Stern
2010-12-16 15:53 ` Pavan Kondeti [this message]
2010-12-16 11:09 ` [RFC v2 2/4] USB: gadget: OTG supplement revision " Pavankumar Kondeti
2010-12-16 11:09 ` [RFC v2 3/4] USB: EHCI: Notify HCD about HNP enabled port suspend Pavankumar Kondeti
2010-12-16 11:09 ` [RFC v2 4/4] USB: Eliminate delays involved in root hub initialization during HNP Pavankumar Kondeti
2010-12-16 12:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-16 13:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-12-16 13:13 ` Pavan Kondeti
2010-12-16 13:17 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0A3609.7000002@codeaurora.org \
--to=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).