From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar Subject: Re: [Qualcomm PM8921 MFD 1/6] mfd: pm8921: Add PMIC 8921 core driver Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:38:24 -0800 Message-ID: <4D6F0D30.1050403@codeaurora.org> References: <1299104001-5240-1-git-send-email-adharmap@codeaurora.org> <1299104001-5240-2-git-send-email-adharmap@codeaurora.org> <20110302222850.GA32325@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:14100 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756830Ab1CCDiZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:38:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110302222850.GA32325@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: davidb@codeaurora.org, "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Bryan Huntsman , Daniel Walker , David Collins , Grant Likely , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joe Perches , Russell King , Samuel Ortiz , Stepan Moskovchenko , Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:13:16PM -0800, adharmap@codeaurora.org wrote: > >> +config MFD_PM8XXX >> + tristate "Support for Qualcomm PM8xxx subdevices" >> + help >> + This option enables the usage of various Qualcomm PMIC 8xxx subdevice >> + drivers. This is required in order to use generic PM8xxx subdevice >> + drivers. Selecting with option will result in PM8xxx subdevice >> + drivers being compiled by default. > > As this is selected by the driver it shouldn't have any help text - > there's no point in users seeing the option since it's useless by > itself. If we get enough to make an option useful either a menu or > dependencies from the individual MFDs would be a better option. Agree will fix this. > >> +static int __devinit pm8921_add_subdevices(const struct pm8921_platform_data >> + *pdata, >> + struct pm8921 *pmic) >> +{ >> + return 0; >> +} > > This looks suspicious. True, the next patch fills in this function. Will remove it from here. > >> +static int __init pm8921_init(void) >> +{ >> + return platform_driver_register(&pm8921_driver); >> +} >> +postcore_initcall(pm8921_init); > > Typically subsys_initcall() has been used. Yes will change this and others to subsys_initcall() -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.