From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
per.lkml@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mmc: allow upper layers to determine immediately if a card has been removed
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:23:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED39964.7020806@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a3d4e0770dc0d7421d6abf0e1a57166.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
On 28/11/11 15:37, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
>
>> Add a function mmc_detect_card_removed() which upper layers
>> can use to determine immediately if a card has been removed.
>> This function should be called after an I/O request fails so
>> that all queued I/O requests can be errored out immediately
>> instead of waiting for the card device to be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 51
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 3 ++
>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 12 ++++++++++-
>> drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 12 ++++++++++-
>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 11 +++++++++-
>> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 3 ++
>> include/linux/mmc/core.h | 2 +
>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>> 8 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index 271efea..3dacc98 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ void mmc_request_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct
>> mmc_request *mrq)
>> cmd->retries = 0;
>> }
>>
>> - if (err && cmd->retries) {
>> + if (err && cmd->retries && !mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>> /*
>> * Request starter must handle retries - see
>> * mmc_wait_for_req_done().
>> @@ -247,6 +247,11 @@ static void __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>> struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> {
>> init_completion(&mrq->completion);
>> mrq->done = mmc_wait_done;
>> + if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>> + mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> + complete(&mrq->completion);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -259,7 +264,8 @@ static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host
>> *host,
>> wait_for_completion(&mrq->completion);
>>
>> cmd = mrq->cmd;
>> - if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries)
>> + if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
>> + mmc_card_removed(host->card))
>> break;
>>
>> pr_debug("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
>> @@ -1456,7 +1462,7 @@ void mmc_detect_change(struct mmc_host *host,
>> unsigned long delay)
>> WARN_ON(host->removed);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> #endif
>> -
>> + host->detect_change = 1;
>> mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, delay);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2049,6 +2055,43 @@ static int mmc_rescan_try_freq(struct mmc_host
>> *host, unsigned freq)
>> return -EIO;
>> }
>>
>> +int _mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) || !host->bus_ops->alive)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!host->card || mmc_card_removed(host->card))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + ret = host->bus_ops->alive(host);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + mmc_card_set_removed(host->card);
>> + pr_info("%s: card removed\n", mmc_hostname(host));
>
> We are printing the same information when mmc_remove_card() is called. Can
> we move this to pr_debug() here?
Changed in V4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 13:02 [PATCH V3] mmc: allow upper layers to determine immediately if a card has been removed Adrian Hunter
2011-11-28 13:32 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-28 14:22 ` Adrian Hunter
2011-11-28 13:37 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-28 14:23 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED39964.7020806@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=sthumma@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).