linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	per.lkml@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mmc: allow upper layers to determine immediately if a card has been removed
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:23:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED39964.7020806@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a3d4e0770dc0d7421d6abf0e1a57166.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>

On 28/11/11 15:37, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
> 
>> Add a function mmc_detect_card_removed() which upper layers
>> can use to determine immediately if a card has been removed.
>> This function should be called after an I/O request fails so
>> that all queued I/O requests can be errored out immediately
>> instead of waiting for the card device to be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c  |   51
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  drivers/mmc/core/core.h  |    3 ++
>>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c   |   12 ++++++++++-
>>  drivers/mmc/core/sd.c    |   12 ++++++++++-
>>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c  |   11 +++++++++-
>>  include/linux/mmc/card.h |    3 ++
>>  include/linux/mmc/core.h |    2 +
>>  include/linux/mmc/host.h |    1 +
>>  8 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index 271efea..3dacc98 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ void mmc_request_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct
>> mmc_request *mrq)
>>  			cmd->retries = 0;
>>  	}
>>
>> -	if (err && cmd->retries) {
>> +	if (err && cmd->retries && !mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>>  		/*
>>  		 * Request starter must handle retries - see
>>  		 * mmc_wait_for_req_done().
>> @@ -247,6 +247,11 @@ static void __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>> struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>  {
>>  	init_completion(&mrq->completion);
>>  	mrq->done = mmc_wait_done;
>> +	if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>> +		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> +		complete(&mrq->completion);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>>  	mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -259,7 +264,8 @@ static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host
>> *host,
>>  		wait_for_completion(&mrq->completion);
>>
>>  		cmd = mrq->cmd;
>> -		if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries)
>> +		if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
>> +		    mmc_card_removed(host->card))
>>  			break;
>>
>>  		pr_debug("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
>> @@ -1456,7 +1462,7 @@ void mmc_detect_change(struct mmc_host *host,
>> unsigned long delay)
>>  	WARN_ON(host->removed);
>>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>>  #endif
>> -
>> +	host->detect_change = 1;
>>  	mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, delay);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -2049,6 +2055,43 @@ static int mmc_rescan_try_freq(struct mmc_host
>> *host, unsigned freq)
>>  	return -EIO;
>>  }
>>
>> +int _mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) || !host->bus_ops->alive)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (!host->card || mmc_card_removed(host->card))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	ret = host->bus_ops->alive(host);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		mmc_card_set_removed(host->card);
>> +		pr_info("%s: card removed\n", mmc_hostname(host));
> 
> We are printing the same information when mmc_remove_card() is called. Can
> we move this to pr_debug() here?

Changed in V4

      reply	other threads:[~2011-11-28 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-28 13:02 [PATCH V3] mmc: allow upper layers to determine immediately if a card has been removed Adrian Hunter
2011-11-28 13:32 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-28 14:22   ` Adrian Hunter
2011-11-28 13:37 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-28 14:23   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ED39964.7020806@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=per.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=sthumma@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).