From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msm: timer: Support sched_clock()
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:24:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F47C7C5.4090806@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120224170901.GA9312@codeaurora.org>
On 24/02/12 17:09, David Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:11:14AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 22/02/12 21:55, David Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> Now that sched_clock is mandatory on ARM it's simple to add
>>>> sched_clock support to the MSM timer code. Add it so that we get
>>>> more accurate sched_clock output than the jiffies based version
>>>> that's provided by default.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> Marc, are you able to pull this into your series, so they can all go
>>> in together? If so:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> David, Stephen,
>>
>> Russell already pulled my sched_clock() patch series, so I'm not sure it
>> is actually useful for me to carry it (and there is actually no
>> dependency between this patch and the series). Maybe putting it in the
>> patch system or via armsoc would be best?
>>
>> Otherwise:
>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>
> I'll keep an eye on it then, and push it into the ARM soc tree when
> the dependencies are there.
The whole thing is that there's no dependency. The sched_clock() stuff
has hit mainline during the merge window. This patch could go in right
now, without any harm.
What Russell pulled is just a cleanup to convert the last two platforms
having their own sched_clock() and not relying on our framework.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 1:39 [PATCH] msm: timer: Support sched_clock() Stephen Boyd
2012-02-22 21:55 ` David Brown
2012-02-24 10:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-02-24 17:09 ` David Brown
2012-02-24 17:24 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2012-02-24 17:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-24 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-02-25 1:10 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F47C7C5.4090806@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).