From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@ti.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@linaro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: Move init fields from clk to clk_hw
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:57:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F85E238.9050102@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJOA=zMEN_im3-T+_uXB_mTu842o_fRkr9-7h=X18fKBoH46aQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/11/2012 10:59 AM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Saravana Kannan<skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> (*nudge*) (*nudge*) again :-)
>>
>> Sorry to keep nudging you on this often. The longer we wait for this, the
>> more churn it will cause later on. That's why I'm being persistent on this.
>> Also, once this goes in, I can start working on upstreaming MSM clock
>> support.
<SNIP>
> TL;DR: I think a combination of your change to expose the
> not-so-private parts of struct clk into struct clk_hw are OK and have
> real benefits for the clk-provider.h code. However we need to
> implement it such that all the statically initialized data can be
> __initdata.
Sounds like a reasonable compromise.
> My only concern with this series is that platform clock code will
> access struct clk_hw members without the appropriate lock held (namely
> prepare_lock). I'm a bit worried that there might be a case where
> some clock code access clk_hw->name when clk_hw has somehow been
> destroyed/altered (e.g. if clk_put every finally gets implemented...).
> Besides clk_put are there any real instances where this might happen?
This problem is true for any struct/field marked as __init_data. So, I
don't think this is a real problem. If someone is stupid enough to mark
their data as __init_data and access them later, then there is not much
we can do. Also, I believe the compiler throws out some warning when you
try to access __init_data from non-init code.
> I'll be pushing my fixes branch out to the list soon. Do you want to
> rebase this change on top of it taking into account the __initdata
> bits?
I thought it might be easier for you to base your changes on top of my
patch. But I can try to rebase mine on top of your changes. Hopefully
your fixes aren't crazy big/complex.
This is a busy week for me at work. I will try to send a patch in a day
or two.
Thanks,
Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAJOA=zN2cSSpM92oRnW0RyU_ZzyoQ=jthc-fAkf-P3z37uWt7w@mail.gmail.com>
2012-03-20 3:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: Fix error handling in fixed clock hardware type register fn Saravana Kannan
2012-03-20 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: Move init fields from clk to clk_hw Saravana Kannan
2012-03-20 7:20 ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-20 7:54 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-20 8:13 ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-20 9:40 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-20 10:17 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-20 18:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-20 20:14 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-20 22:40 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-22 3:23 ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-20 14:18 ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-20 18:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-20 20:06 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-20 23:12 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-21 1:47 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-21 3:01 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-27 4:35 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-27 18:49 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-27 22:27 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-06 1:30 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-11 17:59 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-11 19:57 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2012-04-11 20:17 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-11 20:21 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-20 23:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-21 9:16 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-20 7:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: Fix error handling in fixed clock hardware type register fn Sascha Hauer
2012-03-20 7:46 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-21 0:13 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-21 2:32 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-21 5:45 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-21 6:33 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-21 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-21 19:56 ` Turquette, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F85E238.9050102@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dsaxena@linaro.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=richard.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).