From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Drop redundant /smd node
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 21:00:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d2e6530-ec72-6b76-ed75-c623071bba53@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531-rpm-rproc-v1-14-e0a3b6de1f14@gerhold.net>
On 5.06.2023 09:08, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> The "smd-edge"s for remote processors are typically specified below the
> remoteproc nodes. For some reason apq8064 also has them all listed in a
> top-level /smd node, disabled by default. None of the boards enable them.
>
> Right now apq8064 only has support for WCNSS/riva, but there the
> smd-edge is already defined with the same interrupt etc below the
> riva-pil node.
>
> Drop these redundant definitions since the /smd top-level node is now
> deprecated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
> ---
Hm, 2012 is calling.. it wants it dead code back!
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Konrad
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 40 -------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> index d2289205ff81..e0adf237fc5c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> @@ -226,46 +226,6 @@ smem {
> hwlocks = <&sfpb_mutex 3>;
> };
>
> - smd {
> - compatible = "qcom,smd";
> -
> - modem-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 37 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 8 3>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <0>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> -
> - q6-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 90 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 8 15>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <1>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> -
> - dsps-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 138 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&sps_sic_non_secure 0x4080 0>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <3>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> -
> - riva-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 198 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 8 25>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <6>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> - };
> -
> smsm {
> compatible = "qcom,smsm";
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-05 7:08 [PATCH 00/14] Add dedicated device tree node for RPM processor/subsystem Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 01/14] dt-bindings soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Fix sort order Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-06 6:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 02/14] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Add MSM8909 to qcom,smd-channels Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-06 6:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 03/14] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Add some more compatibles Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-06 6:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 04/14] soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Match rpmsg channel instead of compatible Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 18:49 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 05/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Qualcomm RPM processor/subsystem Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 8:33 ` Rob Herring
2023-06-05 9:16 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-06 6:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-06 8:55 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-07 8:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 06/14] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Use qcom,rpm-proc in example Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 8:33 ` Rob Herring
2023-06-05 9:20 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-06 6:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-06 9:06 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-06 9:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 07/14] dt-bindings: qcom: smd: Mark as deprecated Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 08/14] soc: qcom: smem: Add qcom_smem_is_available() Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 18:53 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 19:13 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 09/14] rpmsg: qcom_smd: Use qcom_smem_is_available() Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 18:56 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 19:18 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 19:45 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 10/14] soc: qcom: Add RPM processor/subsystem driver Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 19:06 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 19:51 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 19:55 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 20:31 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 11/14] arm64: dts: qcom: Add rpm-proc node for SMD platforms Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 19:07 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 12/14] arm64: dts: qcom: Add rpm-proc node for GLINK gplatforms Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 19:43 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-05 19:55 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: dts: qcom: Add rpm-proc node for SMD platforms Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Drop redundant /smd node Stephan Gerhold
2023-06-05 19:00 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d2e6530-ec72-6b76-ed75-c623071bba53@linaro.org \
--to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox