From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: rpmh: Set wake/sleep state for BCM clks
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:15:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e14f1d5-2abc-8c30-d54d-7e542ca4eccf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n53eXiz74iCHHQaC-eDFkuui9Y1xXvuqd2g0UnrwbYhZTg@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/11/22 5:04 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Will you take this in fixes, or do you want me to pick it for 5.19?
>>>
>> I'm waiting for Taniya to reply. For all I know this has no effect
>> because there's some sort of copy/paste from one state to another. Until
>> then it doesn't seem like we should do anything.
> Taniya told me that if there's no sleep or wake state set then active
> state remains even when the subsystem is in sleep. Not exactly
> copy/paste but at least it is consistent. We need a comment here so this
> doesn't come up again.
If I understand what you're saying here, your original patch is not
necessary, but there should be a comment in the code that explains
why that is the case. Is that right? And am I right to assume you
will be sending out a patch with such a comment?
-Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-12 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 19:45 [PATCH] clk: qcom: rpmh: Set wake/sleep state for BCM clks Stephen Boyd
2022-04-12 20:42 ` Alex Elder
2022-05-04 16:53 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-05-06 23:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-11 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-12 15:15 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2022-05-17 6:06 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e14f1d5-2abc-8c30-d54d-7e542ca4eccf@linaro.org \
--to=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quic_tdas@quicinc.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox