From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/11] Remove ARM local timer API Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:39:28 +0200 Message-ID: <51AC5640.5060202@linaro.org> References: <1368473175-4841-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20130531174526.GD599@codeaurora.org> <51A8E71D.1000407@linaro.org> <20130531221633.GG599@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130531221633.GG599@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Marc Zyngier , Kukjin Kim , Barry Song , Daniel Walker , Bryan Huntsman , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Abraham , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 06/01/2013 12:16 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 05/31, John Stultz wrote: >> On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about >>> ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or >>> shall I route them through arm-soc or something else? >> >> >> So there looks to be a fair amount of additions in the ARM tree, do >> those already have acks from Arnd/Olof/other folks? (I think I was >> only cc'ed on the first two patches). >=20 > I'm still missing acks from Kukjin and Barry. >=20 >> >> Daniel (cc'ed) has just started helping out here, and should be able >> to review and hopefully ack or pick up the timer related >> drivers/clocksource changes to feed to Thomas' tree. Not sure if >> he's got them in his mailbox so you might want to resend them and >> make sure he's CC'ed. >> >> If Arnd/Olof/whomever else from the arm side has acked things, >> Daniel probably could queue the arm changes too, but it might be >> better just to get Daniel's ack on the drivers/clocksource changes >> and then queue things via arm-soc? >=20 > Either way works for me. I would just like to see this merged > into 3.11. I guess I will resend one more time. Yes please, resend. I will review them. queuing the patches via arm-soc makes sense for me, but I prefer to review them before we decide to which tree we get them merged. Thanks -- Daniel --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for= ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog