From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rohit Vaswani Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for MSM8974 Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:36:38 -0700 Message-ID: <51FB2946.2050503@codeaurora.org> References: <1375406619-14618-1-git-send-email-rvaswani@codeaurora.org> <51FB1987.3060806@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:35636 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753892Ab3HBDgk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 23:36:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51FB1987.3060806@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: David Brown , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Russell King , Daniel Walker , Bryan Huntsman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 8/1/2013 7:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/01/2013 07:23 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: >> This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 which >> belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family. >> For now, just support a basic machine with device tree. >> arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > That's odd. If this is support for an SoC, why not a *.dtsi file rather > than *.dts? I am not sure why I would need a dtsi if I am just adding the 1 file for the SoC support ? Thanks, Rohit Vaswani -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation