From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 09/10] cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_generic' Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:01:33 -0700 Message-ID: <540E435D.1070706@codeaurora.org> References: <540E3933.8000904@codeaurora.org> <1721663.ItCsG3Tt8O@vostro.rjw.lan> <3644672.iCZ87qpZY4@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:42683 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755256AbaIIABg (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 20:01:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3644672.iCZ87qpZY4@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, shawn.guo@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, spk.linux@gmail.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com On 09/08/14 16:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > So more bikeshedding. :-) > > Isn't "generic" somewhat too broad? Surely it doesn't cover x86. And does > it actually cover anything without clocks/regulators? > I thought when you bikeshed you have to come up with a different color ;-) Perhaps "cpufreq_cpus"? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation