From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] clk: qcom: Introduce parent_map tables Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:19:53 -0700 Message-ID: <5509CFD9.80209@codeaurora.org> References: <1426685535-25071-1-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35693 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbbCRTT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:19:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1426685535-25071-1-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Georgi Djakov , mturquette@linaro.org Cc: galak@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 03/18/15 06:32, Georgi Djakov wrote: > This patchset introduces the parent_map index tables, which solve the > issue discussed here [1]. > While doing this, fix also some of the code around (patches 1 and 2) > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/5/682 > > Patchset based on clk-next. The concept looks fine, but I don't see how the series is bisectable. Half way through we change the struct definition and that should break all the drivers, right? Please fix that. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project