Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com>,
	Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>,
	Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>,
	Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: core: Fix coresight device probe failure issue
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 10:27:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5529d0f7-e81f-4def-0d34-eb3f1801cc45@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220302080132.20946-1-quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>

On 02/03/2022 08:01, Mao Jinlong wrote:
> It is possibe that probe failure issue happens when the device
> and its child_device's probe happens at the same time.
> In coresight_make_links, has_conns_grp is true for parent, but
> has_conns_grp is false for child device as has_conns_grp is set
> to true in coresight_create_conns_sysfs_group. The probe of parent
> device will fail at this condition. Add has_conns_grp check for
> child device before make the links and make the process from
> device_register to connection_create be atomic to avoid this
> probe failure issue.
> 
> Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> index 88653d1c06a4..7ce78dddfe31 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> @@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static int coresight_fixup_device_conns(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>   			continue;
>   		conn->child_dev =
>   			coresight_find_csdev_by_fwnode(conn->child_fwnode);
> -		if (conn->child_dev) {
> +		if (conn->child_dev && conn->child_dev->has_conns_grp) {
>   			ret = coresight_make_links(csdev, conn,
>   						   conn->child_dev);
>   			if (ret)
> @@ -1619,6 +1619,7 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
>   	csdev->dev.fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(dev_fwnode(desc->dev));
>   	dev_set_name(&csdev->dev, "%s", desc->name);
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&coresight_mutex);
>   	ret = device_register(&csdev->dev);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		put_device(&csdev->dev);
> @@ -1645,8 +1646,6 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	mutex_lock(&coresight_mutex);
> -
>   	ret = coresight_create_conns_sysfs_group(csdev);
>   	if (!ret)
>   		ret = coresight_fixup_device_conns(csdev);
> @@ -1666,6 +1665,7 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
>   err_free_csdev:
>   	kfree(csdev);
>   err_out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&coresight_mutex);

This appears to be wrong. We may do an unlock when we didn't lock it in
the first place.
Please could you double check. Also, I think it may be neater to move
the kfree(csdev) to the only user and return straight away from there.

Cheers
Suzuki




>   	/* Cleanup the connection information */
>   	coresight_release_platform_data(NULL, desc->pdata);
>   	return ERR_PTR(ret);


      reply	other threads:[~2022-03-02 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-02  8:01 [PATCH] coresight: core: Fix coresight device probe failure issue Mao Jinlong
2022-03-02 10:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5529d0f7-e81f-4def-0d34-eb3f1801cc45@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_hazha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_taozha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox