From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: Make qcom_smem_get() return a pointer Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:50:24 -0700 Message-ID: <55E5E560.6080507@codeaurora.org> References: <1441071666-16156-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20150901045055.GA13472@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:59652 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752698AbbIARu0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:50:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150901045055.GA13472@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Andy Gross , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 08/31/2015 09:50 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 31 Aug 18:41 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd >> --- >> >> This is on top of the smd and smem big endian support. >> > How sneaky of you, then we need to approve those patches before we > add new consumers of this API... I was being explicit to remove any subterfuge. I actually rebased this to the end of the series, so I suspect it will apply fine without the big endian stuff. This was mostly making a note that I tested this on top of those commits. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project