From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:59:13 -0600 Message-ID: <564179A1.2080304@codeaurora.org> References: <1446958380-23298-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1446958380-23298-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <56400DD4.5080506@codeaurora.org> <564178A5.6080603@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <564178A5.6080603@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sinan Kaya , Andy Shevchenko Cc: dmaengine , cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm Mailing List , Vinod Koul , Dan Williams , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Sinan Kaya wrote: > > OK. I did an internal code review before posting the patch. Nobody > complained about iterator types. I am trying to find what goes as a good > practice vs. what is personal style. I normally check for inappropriate usage of sized integers in my reviews, but I admit I'm inconsistent about that sort of thing for internal reviews. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.