From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: qcom: Make oxili GDSC parent of oxili_cx GDSC Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:49:22 +0530 Message-ID: <564564CA.5040608@codeaurora.org> References: <1443727374-1539-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1443727374-1539-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20151006193217.GH12338@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151006193217.GH12338@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd , Mike Turquette Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 10/07/2015 01:02 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/01, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> The oxili_cx GDSC is inside the power domain of the oxili GDSC. >> Add the dependency so that the CX domain can properly power up. >> >> Reported-by: Rob Clark >> Cc: Rajendra Nayak >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd >> --- > > Applied to clk-next I don't see this in clk-next. Was this dropped for some reason? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation