From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, al.stone@linaro.org,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, jcm@redhat.com, torez@redhat.com,
lv.zheng@intel.com, Timur Tabi <timur@quicinc.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] console/acpi: add DBG2 and SPCR console configuration
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:14:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56951841.4010101@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441716217-23786-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Hi,
On 09/08/2015 08:43 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Support for configuring bootconsole and console via the ACPI tables
> DBG2 (Debug Port Table 2) [1] and SPCR (Serial Port Console Redirection
> Table) [2], defined by Microsoft, has been discussed on and off over the
> years.
>
> [1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn639131(v=vs.85).aspx
> [2] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn639132(v=vs.85).aspx
>
> Licensing concerns have prevented this happening in the past, but as of
> 10 August 2015, these tables have both been released also under OWF 1.0
> (http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0)
> which is think is noncontroversially GPL-compatible?
>
> This set is a first attempt at implementing this.
>
> Submitting as an RFC since the SPCR handling currently depends on the
> console driver being initialized after subsystem initcalls. Workaround
> to enable testing surrounding infrastructure in 5/5, _really_ not
> intended to be merged.
> (Suggestions for acceptable ways of working around this appreciated.)
What's required for this to graduate from RFC status? Is anyone working
on it?
Thanks,
Christopher Covington
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-12 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1441716217-23786-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
2016-01-12 15:14 ` Christopher Covington [this message]
2016-01-13 0:07 ` [RFC 0/5] console/acpi: add DBG2 and SPCR console configuration Al Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56951841.4010101@codeaurora.org \
--to=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=timur@quicinc.com \
--cc=torez@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).